CC 01-11-1982 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Minutee of Regular Council Meeting January 11, 198Z Christoffereen said a master meter station and a pressure reduc- ing valve would be required; connection would require extension of the water main, estimated at $30,000 ~ $40,000. Council con- curred that connection costs would be the responsibility of Arden Manor and connection would be subject to approval by the City. Chrietoffersen noted looped; will need an paired) . that the Arden M~~r eystem is internally emergency by-pas~eter (if meter must be re- REPORT OF VILLAGE PLANNER ORLYN MILLER Case No. 81-37, Lot Split and Consolidation - R.L.S. 306, Evelyn Kiene-Dunn Council was referred to Planning Memo (12-29-81) and to a trans- parency of Registered Land Survey 306, indicating the propoaed split of a 22, 250 eq. ft. parcel from Lot C to be consolidated with Lot D. . Miller explained that the proposed split and consolidation repre- sente an improvement to Lot D without negatively affecting Lot C; noted that Lot D remains a difficult lot to develop and spproval of the request should not be interpreted to mean that an on-site eeptic syatem and/or fill of the existing low land will be approved. Miller reported that the Planning Commission recommends Council approval of the requeeted lot split and consolidation. After discussion, Johnson moved, seconded by McAllister, that Council approve the lot split and consolidation (Case No. 81-37), with the contingency that an access easement has been recorded assuring access to all lots in R.L.S. 306 from Snelling Avenue. Motion carried unanimouely (3-0). Case No. 81-38, Variance for Sign - 3151 Lake Johanna Boulevard, Steven Scheel - All Star Video Council was refer~ed to Planning Memo and to a transparency of the site, indicating the proposed sign location, requiring a 15 foot setback variance from three property lines (10' from etreet r. o.w.). Miller noted that the existing sign (4' x 8') ia on the ground; applicant proposes to mount the sign on two timber posts at a height of 12 feet, in the same location on the site. Miller reported that the Planning Commission recommends approval of the setback variances subject to compliance with all other re- quirements of the sign ordinance, and that consideration be given to limiting the area of the changeable copy portion of the sign, the lighting intensity and the hours the sign would be lighted and visible to residents. Miller noted that the Board of Appeals recommends denial of the sign as currently located because it obstructs vision for traffic; feels adequate sign could be located on building as permitted by the ordinance. It was noted by Miller that a sign on the building would not pro- vide visibility for south-bound traffic on New Brighton Road and Lake Johanna Boulevard. . In discueeion, Scheel said he has not received any complaints about the sign; feels he needs sign visibility from all directions; apparently the sign meets all other requirements of the ordinance except setback. After discussion of the appropriateness of the sign (type, color, quality and nuisance) to the neighborhood, McAllister moved, eeconded by Johneon, that Council grant approval of the 15 foot setback variances as detailed in eketch submitted (without flash- ing lights), with interior illumination. Johnson moved that the motion be amended limiting the hours of illumination of sign to 7:30 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. Amendment carried unanimously (3-0). Original motion did not carry (Johnson voting in favor of the motion; McAllister, Woodburn voting in opposition. (1-2) -2-