CC 05-13-1985 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Minutes of Regular Council Meeting, May 13 Page six 4. The use of the church and supporting facilities wit~the R-l Zoning District shall be limited to those uses and activities normally associated with a church operation. Extensive use of the church facilities by rental or lease arrangement specifically for the purpose of generating revenue for North Heights Lutheran Church shall be prohibited, except as approved by the City Council. 5. The parking provided for Stage 1 shall be monitored by North Heights Lutheran Church and the City to determine parking demand patterns and adequacy of supply before additional expansion stages, as depicted on the Concept Plan, are permitted. If parking demand increases to a point that adequate spaces cannot be provided within site coverage limitations, future enlargement of worship space and support facilities may be restricted accordingly. and that Council discussed the need for an E.A.W. and decided it is not necessary. Motion on the amendment was seconded by Peck and carried unanimously. (5-0) . Sather stated that he feels the applicant has shown sensitivity for the area and that Council appreciates this; expressed disappointment relative to the discussion about the symbol; thanked the applicant for his work and patience. The original motion carried unanimously. (5-0) Case No. 84-5. Interpretation of Modification of Special Use Permit re Site Plan (ParkinR and LandscapinR) - Arden Shoreview Animal Hospital. Dr. Richard Routhe Miller advised that a decision to approve or disapprove the site plan changes is not requested tonight; explained that the animal hospital is currently waiting for the site to dry out so paving and landscaping can be completed; reported that the applicant has re-assessed the site plan and proposes to re-arrange the parking and landscaped areas to provide a large space to' exercise animals (west of the building) iustead of the narrow space at the north between building and fence. Miller explained that use of the site is not affected; Council is asked to make the determination of whether the proposed site plan changes are deemed to be "insignificant"; if so, an amended Special Use Permit (which requires the same procedure as a new SUP) is not required, and the site plan changes can be reviewed without holding a Public Hearing. After discussion, Hicks moved, seconded by Hansen, that Council interpret the proposed changes as "not significant" and do not require an Amended Special Use Permit. Motion carried unanimously. (5-0) Case No. 84-23, Shore land ManaRement Ordinance Council was referred to Planning memo of 3/20/85, Planning Commission recom- mendation (minutes of 5/1/85) and to Preliminary Request for Lake Reclassification and Zoning Provision Modifications. Miller reported that the Planning Commission, upon recommendation of the Shoreland subcommittee, recommends Council approval of the changes in clas- sifications and development standards as submitted. Miller noted that after approval by City Council and subsequent approval by the DNR, a Shore land Management Ordinance will be prepared for adoption by the Council. Miller briefly reviewed the justification for the reclassifications re- quested. After discussion, Hansen moved to adopt Resolution No. 85-22, . RESOLUTION REQUESTING DNR APPROVAL OF RECLASSIFICATION AND ZONING PROVISION MODIFICATION, AS SUBMITTED. Motion was seconded by Peck and carried unanimously (5-0). REPORT OF VILLAGE TREASURER DONALD LAMB Investments April 30, 1985 - $2.406,520.00at 1st Bank Mpls. at 7.34% to mature May I, 1985. - $200,000.00 at First Federal at 8.20% to mature July 10, 1985. $600,000.00 at First Federal at 8.4% to mature August 12, 1985. $377,241.50 at First Federal at 8.4% to mature September 10, 1985. May 1, 1985