My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 05-13-1996
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1996
>
CCP 05-13-1996
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:12:49 PM
Creation date
11/10/2006 3:11:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
43
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> I' <br /> ~. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - APRIL 29.1996 5 <br /> I MOTION: Hicks moved and Keirn seconded a motion to adopt Resolution No. 96-28, <br /> . Requesting Ramsey County to Restrict Parking Along a Portion of County Road <br /> D. The motion carried unanimously (5-0), <br /> 1 D. Resolution No. 96-27. Determining Assessed Costs ofImprovement and Ordering <br /> Preparation of Proposed Assessment Roll in the Matter of the Street Improvements <br /> Project of 1996 <br /> I Mr. Stonehouse stated the bid opening for the 1996 street improvement project was held on April <br /> 26,1996, and that four bids were received. He stated the low bid of$379,973.43 was received <br /> I from T.A. Schifsky, and a high bid of $434,008,05 from Ashbach Construction. <br /> Councilmember Hicks inquired how the $121,591.50 City cost estimate was determined. Mr. <br /> . Stonehouse replied that it was calculated as part of the assessment policy of projected contract <br /> costs plus 32 percent for overhead, legal, and contract management costs. <br /> I Councilmember Malone stated the engineer had previous preliminary calculations on lots for <br /> assessments, and will use these updated cost figures to prepare the final assessment roll. <br /> .. MOTION: Malone moved and Aplikowski seconded a motion to adopt Resolution No. 96- <br /> 27, Determining Assessed Costs ofImprovement and Ordering Preparation of <br /> 1 Proposed Assessment Roll in the Matter of the Street Improvements Project of <br /> 1996, The motion carried unanimously (5-0), <br /> I E, Discussion and Recommendation to Approve 1996 Local #49 Contract Settlement <br /> Mr. Fritsinger stated a final proposal had been presented by the City and ratified by Local #49. <br /> I He stated a bench handout was distributed from Karen Olson, Labor Relations Associates, <br /> clarifYing the proposal for the Council. Mr. Fritsinger stated Stafffelt it was a good contract, and <br /> allows the City to stay within state mandated pay equity requirements. <br /> 1 Mr. Fritsinger stated work rule language still needs to be addressed, and a meeting will be held <br /> I with the union representative, Dwayne Stafford, Public Works Superintendent, and himself to <br /> discuss this item. Mr. Fritsinger stated a re-draft of the contract will then be completed and <br /> forwarded to the Council for signature. <br /> I Councilmember Aplikowski stated that 12 holidays seems excessive. <br /> 1 Councilmember Hicks stated the contract was long in coming, and was good for both the Union <br /> and the City. <br /> ~ <br /> I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.