My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 06-24-1996
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1996
>
CCP 06-24-1996
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:12:51 PM
Creation date
11/10/2006 3:12:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
94
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> I <br />transaction is desired it is important that 100% of the debt service be covered by a general . <br />obligation pledge. This requirement affects the business agreements between parties <br />concerning guaranteed usage levels, access to unallocated time, and calculation of the parties' -. <br />obligations in the event revenues are inadequate to cover debt service and operating and <br />maintenance costs. <br />Although a school district can obligate itself as issuer and/or general obligation guarantor . <br />under the Mighty Ducks legislation, they must seek approval from the Department of Education <br />through the Review and Comment process before constructing facilities that require bonding in <br />excess of $400,000 and are to be used for educational purposes. . <br />Potential Issuers <br />The potential issuers of bonds for the MASC project would include the primary users, with the . <br />exception of MASC, Anoka County, and the Anoka County HRA, or some combination of the <br />above. MASC does not have general taxing authority nor do they have authorization to issue I <br />bonds. <br />We have made the assumption that in any case, the financing type chosen will incorporate the I <br />general obligation pledge of the users. Disregarding the actual authority under which the <br />bonds may be issued, the general obligation pledge could take the form of: <br />(1) A single issuer whose general obligation is the first line of defense for I <br /> bondholders. Underlying agreements with the other parties backed by their <br /> individual general obligations would limit the issuer's financial exposure. <br />(2) An issue sold under a joint party agreement among several of the primary users, e. <br /> with underlying agreements with the other parties limiting the issuers' financial <br /> exposure. I <br />(3) A joint party agreement among all of the obligated users. <br />In each case, the ultimate responsibility for an initial percentage of debt service would be . <br />guaranteed by each party. A process for reallocation of the assigned debt service could be <br />established if desired. <br />The borrowing rate for the bonds will rely on market acceptance of the financing vehicle and . <br />the perceived credit of the transaction. With an underlying general obligation pledge, the <br />bonds should be ratable in some form. If a standard general obligation bond is sold, the rating . <br />will reflect the lowest general obligation credit rating of the first obligor(s). For a lease <br />purchase transaction, the rating is usually reduced 1/2 step from the lowest general obligation <br />credit rating of the first obligor(s), if the facility is perceived to be an essential one. Non- <br />essential facility lease purchase obligations drop one full credit grade. . <br /> I <br /> . <br /> e. <br />DRAFT REPORT 5/30/96 Page 11 . <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.