My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 06-24-1996
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1996
>
CCP 06-24-1996
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:12:51 PM
Creation date
11/10/2006 3:12:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
94
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I Credit ratings are assigned by a number of nationally recognized rating agencies that annually <br /> review information and reevaluate an issuer's credit Moody's Investors Service is widely <br />I- regarded as the rating agency of choice for general obligation bonds. For Minnesota <br /> communities that carry a credit rating on their general obligation bonds, it is generally a <br /> Moody's rating. The potential issuers of bonds for the proposed facility have the following <br /> general obligation ratings as assigned by Moody's Investors Service and published in the <br />I Moody's Bond Record of March, 1996: <br /> Parties to the Master Agreement <br />I City of Arden Hills not listed <br /> City of Blaine A-1 <br /> City of Coon Rapids A <br />I City of Forest Lake Baa <br /> City of Mounds View A <br /> City of New Brighton A-1 <br /> City of Shoreview Aa <br />I City of Spring Lake Park not listed <br /> School District NO.621, Mounds View A <br /> School District NO.16, Spring Lake Park Baa <br />I Not parties to the Master Agreement <br /> Anoka County A-1 <br />I Anoka County H.R.A. no general taxing authority <br /> An explanation of Moody's credit ratings is contained in Appendix IV. <br />I. A bond's credit rating relates inversely to the interest rates which can be expected on the <br /> bonds. The Bloomberg wire service lists the generic yields for general obligation municipal <br /> bonds at. the close of each business day. The rates for April 12, 1996 are included in <br />I Appendix V. <br />I Current Financing Proposal <br /> The financing proposal being discussed currently calls for the County to issue general <br /> obligation bonds. This will permit the entry into the market with an "A-1" rated general <br />I obligation bond. The County is requesting that gross revenue pledges be made by the <br /> participants to secure their position in the financing. The first dollars of revenue under this <br /> arrangement would be available to pay debt service. Operating expenses would be paid with <br />I any additional funds available. The operating pledge within the gross revenue pledge would <br /> require that the participants operate the facility and provide for any operating deficits that may <br /> occur. Appendix VI contains an illustration of the general obligation bond option and the debt <br />I service required annually under four separate options. Two of the options are for a 20 year <br /> financing, one with and one without a funded debt service reserve fund. The second two <br /> options are for a 25 year financing, with and without a funded debt service reserve fund. <br /> Extending the debt service amortization by five years decreases the annual debt service <br />I obligation by approximately $50,000 to $60,000 annually. <br /> Discussions have not been completed with the County regarding what level if any of reserves <br />I for debt or operations will be required. The illustrations contained in Appendix VI does not <br /> presume any prefunded reserves for operations. <br />Ie <br />I DRAFT REPORT 5/30/96 Page 12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.