My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PCP 01-06-2005
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
Commissions, Committees, and Boards
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
2004-2009
>
PC Packets 2005
>
PCP 01-06-2005
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:13:20 PM
Creation date
11/10/2006 3:55:42 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
126
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> " <br /> plans from the contractor. The applicant has provided several computer drawings, sample <br /> building pictures, and narrative to attempt to describc the proposed building. The applicant has . <br /> offered to bring plans back to the Planning Commission as part of a condition of approval if the <br /> materials thc applicant has provided could be substituted in the interim. While staff recognizes <br /> the constraints the applicant has explained, staff determined that plans should still be provided at <br /> the time of Planning Commission consideration. <br /> The proposcd used oil containment building has been reduced in size from about 450 square feet <br /> to a footprint of 200 square feet (10' x 20'). The building that is proposed is still steel <br /> construction, however, the applicant has proposed using a non-mortar brick wainscoting and, if <br /> required by the Planning Commission, would provide a shingle roof instead of a steel roof. The <br /> current Civic Center District requirements allow only brick, stone, and glass as exterior materials <br /> except that metal may be used for trim. Since the primary material is metal, this proposal would <br /> require that the Planning Commission grant the proposal the exception to use metal as the <br /> primary building material. The surrounding buildings in the yard area of the Public Works <br /> Facility are a tan pre-cast concrete panel with black metal trim. The applicant has stated that the <br /> colors of the surrounding materials would be used to try to make the appearance of the buildings <br /> appear more consistent. <br /> The additional narrative provided by the applicant docs not discuss eliminating the 24-hour <br /> operation of thc us cd oil collection facility. As the narrative states, the applicant believes that if <br /> potential users of the facility find that it is lockcd the potential user may either leave used oil <br /> outside of the locked collection facility or dispose of the used oil improperly. The implication is <br /> that a 24-hour facility is preferable as this would provide the potential user access whenever they . <br /> attempted to use the facility. Furthermore, the applicant states that there is an existing video <br /> camera at the filling station just west of the proposed uscd oil and HHW sites, and an additional <br /> camera to cover the used oil site could be added if necessary. The narrative also states that the <br /> Ramsey County Sheriff s Department is already located on site; the general presence of the <br /> Sheriffs Department and Sheriffs Department vehicles should be a deterrent to those <br /> individuals who may try to use the site improperly. The HHW site would only be operated for <br /> about one month at a time for one or more months during the year. The previous HHW site in <br /> Shoreview operated on Fridays an <br /> A letter from Captain Keith Femdon of the Army National Guard states that the proposed used <br /> oil collection and HHW sitc should not interfere with the security and operation of National <br /> Guard facilities. The letter also states that informational street signage should be added to <br /> prevent potential users of the used oil and HHW site from colliding with gates securing the <br /> National Guard property. <br /> Site Plan Review <br /> The following analysis highlights some of the changes proposed in the Special Use Permit <br /> Amendment. <br /> \\Earth\Planning\Planning Cases\2004\04-19 RCPWF SUP Amendment Oil drop site and HHW (PENDING)\01-05-05 PC Report RCPWf SUP . <br /> 2nd Amendment_doc <br /> Page 2 of9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.