My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12-08-25-R
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2020-2029
>
2025
>
12-08-25-R
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/13/2026 4:58:18 PM
Creation date
1/13/2026 4:58:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL—DECEMBER 8, 2025 9 <br /> revenue projections but stated it was safe to say the City's revenues could be increased by <br /> $60,000 which would lower the levy by 1%. <br /> Councilmember Weber asked why the Mayor believed revenues were projected $60,000 lower. <br /> Mayor Grant stated revenues were a projection and he understood there was one large project on <br /> the horizon and larger projects help the City's revenues. <br /> Councilmember Weber explained he was not interested in underfunding the budget for 2026. He <br /> explained he could support moving forward with a reasonable and justified budget and tax levy <br /> increase that would keep the City solvent. <br /> Councilmember Rousseau reported the Mayor supported reducing the levy by at least 1% and <br /> Councilmember Monson and Councilmember Weber supported reductions also. She suggested <br /> the EDA levy be omitted and recommended the INET expenditure be paid down through the <br /> surplus. <br /> Councilmember Weber reported using the surplus would reduce the 2026 budget. He stated he <br /> would be willing to cover the INET expenditure through the surplus. <br /> Councilmember Holden stated the capital improvement fund has deficits over the next 10 years. <br /> She indicated Ramsey County was changing the formula for what the City pays for sidewalks and <br /> trails on County roads. She discussed how the PIR Fund would be needed to cover placeholder <br /> items in the future but noted none of the items listed were guaranteed purchases. She explained <br /> she was uncertain that should be able to approve the $300,000 loader expenditure. <br /> Councilmember Weber questioned if the PIR Fund covered the purchasing of equipment. <br /> Finance Director Yang reported the City had a separate fund for equipment. <br /> Councilmember Weber inquired if the $300,000 loader was included in this budget. <br /> Finance Director Yang stated the $300,000 loader was not included in the 2026 budget. <br /> Mayor Grant commented this Council would need to have more detailed discussions regarding <br /> the PIR Fund in early 2026. <br /> Councilmember Monson strongly disagreed with the Mayor's comment noting the Council has <br /> been discussing the future of the PIR Fund. She explained she supported Councilmember <br /> Rousseau's recommendation to move forward with the tax levy at 12.97%. She stated she would <br /> like to put a motion on the floor to this effect because she had to leave the meeting in ten minutes. <br /> She was of the opinion the Council should be able to run its meetings and be done by 9:00 p.m. <br /> Councilmember Holden stated she would like the summary to be from the Mayor and that she <br /> knows Councilmember Monson is in a hurry. <br /> Mayor Grant said he knows Councilmember Monson is in a hurry and he's sorry she has to go. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.