PCP 09-06-2006 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

5. Visual and land use compatibility with uses and structures on surrounding land; adjoining land values; . 6. Park dedications where applicable; and the 7. Orderly development ofthc neighborhood and the City within the general purpose and intent of this ordinance and the Comprehensive Development Plan for the City. Findin2s of Fact Staff offers thc following findings for consideration: On the Zoning Ordinance Lot Requirements: L The proposed modifications are in confomlimce with the lot requirements in Section 5.F of the Zoning Ordinance. On the Parking Regulations: 2. The size and location ofthe proposed parking is in conformance with Section 6.F ofthe Zoning Ordinance, ~ The proposed parking stalls meet all req uired parking setbacks, .,. 4. The applicant is providing 67 parking spaces on the property where at least 81 would be required based on building size. The applicant currently has a shared parking agreement with 1260 Grey Fox Road, which is also occupied by J.J. Taylor Distributing. If additional parking is needed on the 1300 Grey Fox Road property, there is sufficient . space on the property for more parking. On the Special Use Permit Evaluation Criteria: 5, The proposed use will increase parking and make the property more conforming to the Zoning Ordinance, The increase in parking will eliminate thc need for on-street parking. 6. The proposed use will not produce any signilicant additional noise, glare, odors, vibration, smoke, dust, air pollution, heat, liquid or solid waste, or any other nuisance characteristics, 'lucre may be temporary dust or odors during construction. 7. The proposed use is unlikely to signilicantly affect drainage. This proposal may need Rice Creek Watershed Approval. 8. The proposed use will not affect the population density of the neighborhood. The parking lot expansion is for existing employees. 9. The proposed exterior modifications to 1300 Grey Fox Road will likely have a neutral or positive impact on adjoining properties. 10. The park dedication fee does not apply to this proj eel. 11. The proposed modifications are in conformance with the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance. The proposed modifications are not in conflict with the Comprehensive Development Plan, City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meetingfor September 6,2006 IV'vfelro-iI/Cl.usl,ardenhillslflalllJingIPlanning Cases\2006W6-025 AMrIne jJ Tay/or Size Plall Review (PENDING)!083006 _ PC repor/ AMT e hTe Site Plan Revfew.doc Page 6 of 8