My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PCP 10-04-2006
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
Commissions, Committees, and Boards
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
2004-2009
>
PC Packets 2006
>
PCP 10-04-2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:14:17 PM
Creation date
11/10/2006 4:12:36 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
138
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION -SEPTEMBER 6, 2006 4 <br /> Rolf Oliver, 3505 Siems Court, asked for clarification regarding the east parcel. He . <br /> asked what the elevation from Siems Court to the east property was. He noted Siems <br /> Court was a very steep road. He believed the topography on the east side would be very <br /> extreme. He asked who would maintain that edge and would the trees remain. He stated <br /> the existing landscaping was very nice to screen the neighborhood from the road. Mr. <br /> Lehnhoff responded the elevation was 892 on Lot I and the road's highest elevation was <br /> 910. He indicated the trees on the hillside would not be removed. He stated the trees <br /> were within the 40 foot setback from the lot line and were important for maintaining <br /> stability on the hill. <br /> Ms. Giga stated no large scale tree removal was being requested for the PMP, but some <br /> tree trimming might be necessary for utility access. <br /> Cindy Wheeler, 3576 Siems Court, stated she was not excited about this development. <br /> She expressed concern about the amount offill to be brought in. She asked ifthere was a <br /> charge to the landowner for that fill the City was going to provide. Ms. Giga responded <br /> there was no charge and that was one of the negotiations with the landowner for the City <br /> easement. She noted the fill is excess from the PMP project, and the City is not paying <br /> for the easements on the property. <br /> Ms. Wheeler stated she was not sure it was right to give City fill to a private landowner <br /> for development. If the City wants to do a separate negotiation for an easement, that <br /> would be fairer. She noted the fill being given could have been used for community . <br /> projects rather than giving it to a private development. Chair Sand noted the City <br /> Council would have to address this issue and the plarming Commission's role was to <br /> make sure it met the zoning requirements. <br /> Tom Mulcal1y, 3530 Siems Court, stated he was "delighted" by this development. He <br /> stated he lived down the road from this property. He stated in his opinion, a wonderful <br /> deal has just been made by an owner with the City in a timely fashion because of the <br /> improvements on Siems Court and Ridgewood. He stated the residents would benefit <br /> from the proper handling of a great deal of water with this development. <br /> Bob Minzer, 1600 Lake Johanna Blvd, stated his wife owned the property. He noted the <br /> problem was simple; they had a lot of water coming with one place to put it - on their <br /> land. He indicated they were not happy about this and in exchange for this they were <br /> asking for some fill. He noted they were giving a lot of wetlands to the City, as well as a <br /> pond, for some fill and the ability to build on two of the lots. He noted right now the <br /> water ran into Lake Johanna and with this proposal, the water would not run directly into <br /> the lake and would be treated properly. <br /> Diane Pearson, 1556 Arden Place, stated she was concerned about whether this land <br /> adequately deals with the amount of ponding there needs to be to preserve in the best <br /> possible way the water quality of Lake Johanna. She believed this land was always a <br /> wetland and she believed they needed to be careful because a wetland wants to be a . <br /> wetland. <br /> - - --- ---- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.