CCP 05-26-1998 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

---------.--- , , Lastly, if the City denies the petitioners request, "... it must state in writing the reasons for . the denial at the time that it denies the request." Recnmmendation. The Planning Commission in Planning Case 97-24A, recommends approval of a side yard setback variance for the house addition (three feet proposed, when 10 feet is required) based on the "Findings-Side Yard Setback Variance (house addition)" section of the Staff report dated May 6,1998, subject to the following conditions: 1. Compliance of the plans (Exhibit A, pages I of2 and 2 of2) contained within the Staffreport dated May 6, 1998. 2. Provision of detailed exterior drawings for the addition prior to consideration of this request by the City Council. Updates, The applicant has provided drawings of thc proposed exterior of the addition (Exhibit B). The applicant has stated that the exterior materials will match the materials used on the existing exterior of the structure. 2. Case #98-13, ZLL Lot Split & Variances (lot depth and width), Marlyn Tramm, 3180-3182 Cleveland Avenue Request. The applicant is requesting approval of a Zero Lot Line (ZLL) Lot Split so as to create two (2) parcels for an existing duplex on a .41 acre parcel zoned R-3 Townhouse and Low Density Multiple Dwelling District (Exhibit C). . Background. The applicant request approval to create separate parcels for an existing duplex. The existing duplex was approved as part of Planning Case 77-41 in November of 1977. The home was constructed with the split in mind (ie., separate utilities, fire walls between units, etc.). Deadline for Agency Actions. The City of Arden Hills received the complete application for this request on March 25, 1998. Pursuant to Minnesota State Statute the City must act on this rcquest by Friday, May 22, 1998 (60 days), unless the City provides the petitioner with written reasons for an additional 60 day review period. The additional review period would extend to Thursday, July 23, 1998. The City may with the petitioners consent extend the review period beyond the Thursday, July 23, 1998 date, The Staff has notified the applicant in writing that City would be extending the review period of this case an additional 60 days. Lastly, if the City denies the petitioners request, "... it must state in writing the reasons for the denial at the time that it denies the request." .