CCP 03-29-1999 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

" e Option B, shows a cul-de-sac from the north that would only extend into the edge of the Bachman property. In order to facilitate a 60 foot radius cul-de-sac, property form the two lots in the Hanson Plat along Shoreline Lane would have to be acquired. There is one existing house which would just meet the required 40 foot front yard setback. The property to the west of Shoreline Lane does not currently have a building permit. The cul-de-sac would considerably reduce the buildable area. The cul-de-sac in this location would make it difficult to subdivide the east section of the Bachman property, leaving only two lots possible on the Bachman property where the existing Official Map shows three. Utilities. Both City Sewer and Water currently run through the area with easements (Attachment E). The proposed alignment would have utilities crossing through lot 3 of the Josephine East LLC property that may cause variances to be requested. In the Fall of 1998, a private sewer line was constructed on the Hanson Plat that was to be temporary until Shoreline Lane was constructed and sewer and water were relocated. Lot 2 of the Josephine East LLC property can get water form Lexington Avenue, but it will need a private sewer line with easement through lot 3 to the sewer main on Shoreline Lane. e Deadline for Agency Actions. The City of Arden Hills received the completed application for this request on Febrnary 2, 1999. Pursuant to Minnesota State Statute, the City must act on this request by Friday, April 16, 1999 (60 days), unless the City provides the petitioner with written reasons for an additional 60 day review period. The additional review period would extend to Friday June 25, 1999. The City may, with the petitioners consent, extend the review period beyond the Friday, June 25, 1999, date. Recommendation. The Planning Commission recommends approval of Option A as presented in the Staff report, conditioned on it being acceptable to the City Engineer. Note. The Planning Commission's motion was not to approve the applicant's proposal. Updates. Per, the Planning Commissions rnotion the City Engineer has submitted comrrients pertaining to the proposal and options (Attachment E). Staff has also notified the owners of the property along Shoreline Lane in the Hanson Plat and Bachman property of the cul-de-sac options that were discussed and recommended at the Planning Commission meeting. The applicant submitted a letter March 12, 1999 (Attachment A, page I of 6), explaining their view of the action taken by the Planning Commission. e Pursuant to State Statute Section 462.355 Subd. 3, that a two-thirds vote of all its'members is reqnired to adopt tbis amendment to the official map.