Laserfiche WebLink
<br />northeastern residential area, will be readily accessible to transit service. Overall rating: Good <br /> <br />TC3 Does the plan permit practical reuse of existing infrastructure systems? <br /> <br />Indicators <br />II> Extent to which the plan can accommodate reuse of major utility components, such as the water reservoir or <br />electrical substation. <br />. Extent to which the plan will reuse existing roadbeds. <br />. Extent to which the plan can reuse existing underground utility systems (water, sewer, gas, electricity, etc.). <br /> <br />Evaluation of Plan: This scenario could reuse major utility components. However, reuse of underground utility <br />systems would be limited and probably impractical. Existing road access points may be reused, however. Overall <br />rating: Pair <br /> <br />TC4 Do the transportation and utility systems respect and enhance natural featnres? <br /> <br />Indicators <br />. Extent to which the transportation network follows natural contours and minimizes the need for major site <br />grading or wetland mitigation. <br />II> Extent to which the roadway network avoids sensitive natural areas, wildlife habitats and corridors, steep <br />slopes, unique vegetation and other easily damaged natural features. <br />II> Extent to which the roadway network capitalizes on opportunities to create interesting visual experiences such <br />as vistas, elements of surprise, etc. <br />. Extent to which retention ponds and NURP ponds are needed to control stormwater drainage. <br /> <br />Evaluation of Plan: This scenario is better than earlier plans at minimizing disruption to natural areas. Roadways <br />are most prevalent in parts of the site that have already been impacted by development (e.g., in the southwest <br />quadrant). On-site retention and NURP ponds will be needed to control and filter stormwater drainage. Overall <br />rating: Good <br /> <br />TC5 Will site development overburden the regional higbway network? <br /> <br />Indicators <br />. Extent to which traffic loads generated by the plan would cause traffic on regional roads to exceed their <br />capacity . <br />. Extent to which the plan can accommodate alternative transportation modes (e.g., public transit, bicycle <br />commuting, etc,) that reduce automobile use. <br /> <br />Evaluation of Plan: This plan would load a significant amount of traffic onto the regional roadway system, <br />demanding some improvements in existing capacities and configurations. However, an internal trail system would <br />encourage non-vehicular travel within the site and connect the site to other portions of the region. Neighborhood- <br />serving commercial uses would be present in the village center (and directly across Lexington Avenue in <br />Shoreview). Overall rating' Pair <br /> <br />Open Space and Recreation <br /> <br />RCl Does the plan provide a balance of active and passive recreation opportunities, and of spaces for <br />community-wide and neighborhood use? <br /> <br />Indicators <br />. Extent to which the plan provides space for active recreational pursuits, such as ballfields. <br /> <br />Camiros, Ltd.lSEH, Inc.lLHDL, Ltd_ <br /> <br />TCAAP Framework Plan <br />Page 8 <br /> <br />Chapter V <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />.1 <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />.1 <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />