CCP 02-22-2000 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

. Variety of potential business-generating land uses to which the plan allocates land. . Degree to which the plan provides enough market diversity and flexibility to sustain business activity and formation over time in the face of technological, social and economic changes. . Total amount of land set aside in the plan for potential business-generating land uses. . Extent to which the plan sets aside land that is highly visible and accessible for business-generating land uses. Evaluation of Plan: The ten percent of the site set aside for business-type uses (plus retail areas within the village center) would provide a wide variety of potential market opportunities. About 2 million square feet of usable space could be built in these areas. Again, these uses are located where they would be most visible and accessible. Overall rating: Excellent EC3 Can Alliant Techsystems be accommodated on the site in the short term (say, 10 years) and long term? lndicators . Extent to which a development site in the plan corresponds to the location of Alliant Tech's current facility. '" Extent to which the plan assumes consolidation or elimination of existing ammunition storage magazines and bunkers. . Extent to which the plan contains a site or area to which Alliant Tech could relocate. Evaluation of Plan: Although Alliant Tech's current manufacturing and storage facilities could not be retained in the long term, a new facility (e.g., corporate headquarters building) could be readily accommodated. Because land within the Alliant Tech safety arcs will not be excessed right away, the company may stay in the short term without completely prohibiting new development, although some changes in its operations would be desirable. Overall rating: Fair Financial and Fiscal Impacts FI Will the development scheme be a net drain on or a net contributor to local taxing jurisdictions? Indicators . Extent of the tax base (revenues) provided for by uses in the plan. . Extent of the services ( expenditures) demanded by uses in the plan. Evaluation of Plan: This scenario would generate enough tax base to cover its public operating/ maintenance costs and justifY public investments in infrastructure and public amenities. The timing of the receipt of tax revenues may be a concern, however, due to the timing of the clean-up and excessing process. Overall rating: Good FC2 How much land is set aside for tax-generating uses vs. tax-exempt uses? Indicators . Extent to which the plan allocates land to taxable and non-taxable uses. . Extent to which early development areas may serve as magnets for other appropriate and desirable uses. Evaluation of Plan: About 30% of the site would be set aside for tax-generating uses, with the balance being tax- exempt (open space, public recreation, school, maintenance garage, etc.). This ratio seems to approach the minimum at which site development is feasible, given the public expenses that will be incurred in preparing for that development and maintaining the substantial open space. Overall rating: Good FC3 How much infrastructure (roadways, sewer lines, water service, and off-site storm drainage) must the City provide in advance of development? Camiros. Ltd.lSEH, Inc.lLHDL, Ltd. TCAAP Framework Plan Page 10 Chapter V I .1 I I I I I I I .. I I I I I I .1 I I