Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Comment: Staff believes a combination of Options A (tax increment excess) Ai <br />and C (deferring CIP items) is/would be the most prudent way to address a .. <br />funding deficit in a zero levy increase scenario. <br /> <br />V. Soending Alternatives oreviouslv discussed that are not in baseline. <br /> <br />A. Level of cost participation in 50th Anniversary event ($0 - $50,000) <br /> <br />B. Increase Day in the Park from $1,500 to $7,500 (2000 actual) <br /> <br />C. Add back Community Development Director position ($50,000) <br /> <br />D. Initiate a Community Survey ($8 - $10,000) <br /> <br />E. Develop and maintain a City Web Site. <br /> <br />F. Increase level of part-time inspection/code enforcement services from <br />baseline. ($12,500 from y., time to Y, time) <br /> <br />G. Increase/Improve level of MIS support services/training. <br /> <br />H. Based upon timing of occupancy of new City Hall facility, reflect net effect <br />of reduced rent expense (4364 WRLR) and increased operating expenses <br />(new facility). <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />I. Dedicate antenna rental income to something other than the General Fund <br />instead of using it to buy down the levy requirement. <br /> <br />e <br />