Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. The proposed improvements are a substantial investment into City infrastructure which <br />should have a positi ve effect on the neighborhood property values as well. The City of <br />Eagan had estimated typical residential street improvements to add $3,000.00 to $4,000.00 of <br />value to properties. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Should the reconstructed streets include concrete curbs and gutters? <br /> <br />Yes <br /> <br />The existing streets do not have concrete curb and gutter however some sections of the streets <br />have deteriorated bituminous curbs while others have "sod" curbs at the edge of the bituminous <br />pavement. Hamline Avenue currently does have an existing rural section with ditches or low <br />areas on both sides of the roadway. The area grades range from very flat to moderately hilly and <br />most front yards slope into the roadway and have trees relatively close to the edge of the road. <br /> <br />Staff recommends that concrete barrier (vertical face) curb and gutter be installed throughout the <br />project with the exception of areas that may be selected for rain gardens or the rural section of <br />Hamline A venue. Concrete barrier curbs provide a solid "bookend" to the bituminous pavement, <br />provide for better snow plowing, less potential of cars running over front lawns and increased <br />efficiency of the drainage system. The existing topography of the neighborhood lends itself to <br />curbing and concrete curbing is a great deal more durable than bituminous curbing as is apparent <br />by the dilapidated condition of the exisling bituminous eurbing. In rain garden areas or rural <br />section areas, a 24 inch concrete edge strip (with no vertical curb) is recommended in order to <br />provide the "bookend" for the bituminous pavement and also blend with the concrete curb look <br />throughout the rest of the neighborhood. <br /> <br />Street Structure <br /> <br />Staff recommends that the streets be removed and reconstructed to current standards including a <br />sand subbase, gravel base and bituminous surface. The sand subbase is desirable in order to <br />provide subdrainage for the integrity of the roadway section. The task force discussed the <br />possibility of overlays or cold-in-place recycling of the pavements without a 2 foot cut. Cold-in- <br />place recycling is significantly cheaper in the short run however the roadway subbase would still <br />be more susceptible to freeze thaw and saturation after rainfall events than the recommended <br />sand subbase section. In addition, overlays and in place recycling don't allow for corrections to <br />low points, humps or other undesirable surface irregularities which would be corrected with a <br />full depth reconstruction. <br /> <br />The existing pavement of Femwood Court is in very good condition today (1999 rating of 86) <br />and may not warrant replacement due to the very limited amount of traffic on it. Staff <br />recommends constructing edge strips and/or concrete curbing around Femwood Court and <br />overlaying the surface in lieu of full reconstruction. <br />