Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - SEPTEMBER 11,2000 <br /> <br />[~". <br />.4:/ <br /> <br />29 <br /> <br /> <br />ft:~ir <br />~ I <br /> <br />Mayor Probst asked the City Engineer ifhe needed more direction on the rain garden issue. Mr. <br />Brown felt that the rain gardens should be pursued in the identified areas if the residents are <br />really interested in them. <br /> <br />Councilmember Aplikowski stated that she would not be in favor ofrain gardens if this required <br />the streets to be dug up and utilities to be relocated. Mr. Brown stated that the identified areas <br />for rain gardens would not require this type of work. <br /> <br />Mr. Brown stated that prior to the revision of the feasibility report, the residents of this <br />neighborhood should be asked ifthey are willing to have rain gardens in front of their homes. <br />Mayor Probst was not certain that this must happen before the feasibility report. Councilmember <br />Rem felt that the identified residents should be asked if they would be willing to have rain <br />gardens as soon as possible. <br /> <br />Mayor Probst moved the discussion to the issue of closing Hamline Avenue. <br /> <br />Councilmember Aplikowski stated that Hamline Avenue should not be closed and landscaped. <br />Rather, she felt that it if nothing is done to this roadway it would eventually to go back to a <br />natural area. <br /> <br />Mayor Probst expressed support for the closing of Hamline Avenue. He stated that the road <br />should be removed and the area turned into an amenity for the neighborhood. He stated that he <br />was not certain why this portion of roadway had been built. He stated that reconstructing the <br />road would be a large expense for access to only a one block area. He acknowledged that the <br />result of this closure would be an increase in traffic on the other streets. However, the traffic <br />counts were shown to still be below the residential standard. <br /> <br />Councilmember Rem expressed support for the closure of Hamline A venue. She felt that this <br />would allow more flexibility for the ponds along Hamline Avenue. She stated that the cost to <br />keep the road open was too high versus the benefits of using the land for more drainage. <br /> <br />Councilmember Larson expressed support for the closure of Hamline Avenue for the reasons <br />stated. He noted that the residents have expressed concern of adding more impervious surface <br />and he felt that this section of roadway was not needed. <br /> <br />Councilmember Grant stated that he too supported the closure of Ham line Avenue. He stated <br />that he would like to review detailed plans of how this area will be made an amenity for the <br />neighborhood. <br /> <br />Ms. Swanson stated that the reason the Task Force had been split on this issues was due to <br />concerns of extra traffic and speed oftraffic on the other roads. She hoped that the City Council <br />would task the City Engineer to look at appropriate landscaping, not just for the beauty of the <br />area, but for the safety as well. <br />