My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 10-10-2000
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2000
>
CCP 10-10-2000
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:16:18 PM
Creation date
11/13/2006 1:26:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
226
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - SEPTEMBER 11, 2000 <br /> <br />D~'.'\h 'R:.' '" ",~ 'W" <br />. ;,," J:.'"'' ,;~ .1 <br />' pli ". ,;i, d <br />.. ~" i:iI.Jiij <br /> <br />30 <br /> <br />MOTION: <br /> <br />Councilmember Grant moved and Councilmember Larson seconded a motion to <br />direct the City Engineer to include the closure of Hamline Avenue between <br />Ingerson Road and Tiller Lane in the revised feasibility report. <br /> <br />tit <br /> <br />Councilmernber Aplikowski stated that she would vote against this motion because landscaping <br />the area will add more cost to the project and she felt that the section of roadway should be <br />allowed to go back to nature. <br /> <br />The motion carried (4-1, Councilmember Aplikowski opposed). <br /> <br />Mayor Probst assumed that the issue of the Hamline Avenue ponding area had been dealt with by <br />this action. <br /> <br />Mayor Probst moved the discussion to the issue of the Fernwood Channel. <br /> <br />Councilmember Larson felt that it was important for there to be pretreatment of the water prior to <br />being released into the wetlands or the lake. He did not feel that the City Council should at this <br />time be providing the City Engineer with details of this treatment project. He felt that it would <br />be enough to state that the Council wants pretreatment of water before it reaches Lake Josephine, <br />taking into consideration the amount of water that will flow through the channel, the mix of <br />residents that would be affected by this project, and the natural features of the area. <br /> <br />Mayor Probst asked if the proposed improvements to the Fernwood Channel would add more <br />water to the channel. Mr. Brown stated that the improvements may reduce the amount of water <br />in the channel. <br /> <br />tit <br /> <br />Mayor Probst requested confirmation that the primary issue was to allow some pretreatment of <br />the runoff water. Mr. Brown stated that this was correct. <br /> <br />An audience member noted that the Lake Josephine Association had made some <br />recommendations regarding this issue and asked if these recommendations have been taken into <br />consideration. She indicated that one of the recommendations pointed out that the property <br />closest to Ingerson Court and Fernwood Court is owned by the State of Minnesota and the <br />Association had recommended that the State-owned land be prioritized versus using private land, <br /> <br />Mr. Brown stated that his recommendations reflected the majority of the Lake Josephine <br />Association's recommendations, <br /> <br />Mayor Probst requested confirmation that improvements to the Fernwood Channel were not <br />mandatory, Mr. Brown stated that this was correct. <br /> <br />Mayor Probst believed that the goal of the City would be to stay off the Association's land as <br />much as possible. <br /> <br />An audience member asked if the improvements to the F ernwood Channel will allow for the <br />spawning of fish. Mr. Brown stated that the fish will be able to swim through the pipe. <br /> <br />tit <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.