My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 01-29-2001
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2001
>
CCP 01-29-2001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:16:30 PM
Creation date
11/13/2006 2:35:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
155
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />'- <br /> <br />geometry and massing of the buildings must be responsive to the entire District. <br />Specific elements such as lighting and signage have not been identified for <br />location or design at this stage. <br />i) Concept A. <br />The building faces the Interstates with a small row of parking separating the <br />two. The north side of the building fuces two parking decks across a <br />landscaped area. The view from Gateway Boulevard includes two single level <br />parking decks, upper levels of both office wings and the atrium. <br />ii) Concept B. <br />The five-story building faces the southwest with a small parking area between <br />it and the Interstate. The smaller buildings are angled away from the <br />Interstates to minimize intrusion to the existing wetlands and avoid the power <br />transmission lines. The middle building faces a to level parking deck, <br />connected to the building from the upper level. The smaller buildings face the <br />parking deck across small parking areas. <br />d) Traffic, Site Access and Parking <br />A traffic study for the District was completed by BR W in 1998, analyzing <br />potential development and still keeping Highway 96 and Round Lake Road within <br />design capacity. The conclusion was that the roadway could accommodate 1,100 <br />additional trips in the afternoon peak hours. Concept A was evaluated by the <br />applicant's engineers, SEH, and found that the maximum number of trips <br />generated during this time, as a result of this development, would be 675 trips. <br />The City Engineer has provided comments in a memorandum in Exhibit C. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />In addition to the roadway design, the existing railway bridge will need to be <br />discussed as to its use and maintenance responsibilities if the railway vacates its <br />right-of-way. There has been past discussion of a trail connection, in cooperation <br />with the City of New Brighton. The concepts should include a trail along the <br />south side of Gateway Boulevard, leading up to the railway bridge. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />By the Zoning Ordinance, the parking requirement for an office development is 1 <br />parking space for every 250 square feet. There must be a 50-foot landscape <br />setback from all public streets and 20 feet from other property lines to surface <br />parking areas. <br />i) Concept A <br />Two parking decks provide 716 spaces, surfuce parking provides 1330 spaces <br />and 150 spaces are provided under the office building. This is a total of2196 <br />spaces, 58 spaces more than the 2138 spaces that are required. The minimum <br />setback requirements from surfuce parking are not met in this proposal. The <br />parking setbacks vary between 10 and 40 feet in width along the freeway and <br />between 20 and 75 feet from the paved portion of Gateway Boulevard. There <br />are three accesses off of Gateway Boulevard onto this property. <br />ii) Concept B <br />The parking deck provides 414 spaces, I, I 00 spaces in the surface parking <br />and 60 spaces under the office building for a total of I ,574 spaces. One space <br />is provided for every 200 square feet. Parking setbacks vary between 10 and <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.