Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Pavement Management Plan <br />August 6, 2001 <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />· The consensus was narrowing of the throat at intersections gave the perception of <br />some type of controlled intersection. Narrowing the throat at intersections also <br />enables parking on one or both sides and gives a clear zone for sight distances and <br />intersections as well. <br /> <br />. Council discussed, but no formal agreement was made, on road edge treatments. <br />Council did discuss pavement edging wider to potentially delineate specific areas, <br />i.e., parkways, trail entrances and exits, etc. <br /> <br />Greg Brown has been directed to put together a series of poster boards indicating information <br />that we can overlay to gain a sense of information collected to date, as well as a pictorial <br />representation of what has been discussed and agreed upon. The base map should consist of the <br />identification of the streets by type, collector, local, non-through, cul-de-sac, and alleys. One <br />overlay would consist of those road types with the curb and gutter, if any, indicated and the type <br />of curb indicated, i.e., B 6-18, B 6-12, surmountable asphalt. A third overlay would consist of <br />the pavement condition index as previously drafted from 1999 indicating, in different colors, <br />those streets rated in the 1950's, 1960's, 1970's, and a combination of those rated in the 1980's <br />and 1990's. e <br /> <br />We will also be gathering factual information about the number of road miles of each type of <br />street as well as the number of road miles containing each type of curb and gutter. <br /> <br />e <br />