My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 04-08-2002
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2002
>
CCP 04-08-2002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:16:55 PM
Creation date
11/13/2006 4:01:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
186
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />PMP Memorandum <br />April 10, 2002 <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. Current Funding Summary <br />The following is a summary of thc current funding mechanisms in place for the City's PMP <br />needs and the corresponding annual contributions summcd for twenty years. Thc assessment <br />contribution is based upon the current assessment policy which requires residential properties to <br />contribute 50% of the benefit received from the improvement project. For this analysis, we have <br />assumed that asscssmcnts would contribute half of the strcet reconstruction and overlay costs <br />from the analysis above. This assumption translates to assessment rates of $62.50/FF for <br />reconstruction and $12.50/FF for overlay projects. Both of these assessment rates are greater <br />than ratcs historically levied by the Council for projects. Thc Storm Water Utility fund is <br />assumed to contribute 20% of the project costs for reconstruction projects and 2.5% of project <br />costs for overlay projects (for residential streets). Regional drainage improvements such as <br />ponds and grit chambers etc. are also funded from the Storm Water Utility fund and are not <br />included with this analysis. The General Fund is assumcd to contribute $200,000 per year <br />(approximate current levcl). The city reccivcs an annual disbursemcnt from MnDOT State Aid <br />which offsets projcct costs for State Aid routes but is not assumed to reduce the assessments <br />levied for projects based upon past City policy. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />General Fund Outlay $200,000*20 <br />Storm Water Utility 0.2*$17,200,000 + 0.025*$4,500,000 <br />Assessments 0.5*$17,200,000 + 0.50*$4,500,000 <br />State Aid $200,000*20 <br />Total 20 Year PMP Funding (2002 dollars) <br /> <br />=$ 4,000,000 <br />=$ 3,552,500 <br />=$10,850,000 <br />=$ 4.000.000 <br />=$22,402,500 <br /> <br />Annualized PMP Funding (2002 dollars) <br /> <br />=$ 1,120,125 <br /> <br />As a result of relatively minor investment in the City's pavement infrastructure since 1998, the <br />City has accumulated a substantial amount of capital reserves as of January 1, 2002: <br /> <br />Round Lake Road Reconstruction (Ph 2) <br />Gencral Fund Carry Over 2000 <br />General Fund Carry Over 2001 <br />One-Sided Street Fund <br />Storm Water Utility <br />State Aid Balance <br />Total PMP Reservcs as of Jan 1,2002 <br /> <br />$ 250,000 <br />$ 150,000 <br />$ 150,000 <br />$1,500,000 <br />$ 400,000 <br />$ 600,000 <br />$3,050,000 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Based upon the macro analysis above, the City funding mechanisms and contributions are <br />essentially equivalent to the 20 year annualized needs with a healthy reserve of over 3 million <br />dollars currently. Therefore, it doesn't appear that the City needs to modify cxisting funding <br />mechanisms in order to achieve the twenty year PMP needs. It should be noted however, that <br />assessment contribution towards total project costs have been closer to 36% (for reconstruction <br />projects) in the recent past and not the 50% stated in the policy. If the City maintained an <br />assessment contribution in the range of 36% over the next twenty years the total PMP funding <br />would be reduced by $2,408,000 from $22,402,500 to $19,945,500. This deficit could be <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.