Laserfiche WebLink
<br />A I'I'.EWD r~ f= -,' <br /> <br />AET No, 03-00944- Page 5 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />RESULTS <br /> <br />Soil Boring Lithology <br />Soil boring logs, including field observations, are presented in Appendix B, <br /> <br />Soil within the soil borings consisted of up to 12 feet of fill (silty sand) underlain by sandy clay. <br /> <br />Field Results <br /> <br />The following results were noted during Pill screening of the soil: <br /> <br />. No concentrations of organic vapors were detected by the PID, except for a very low <br /> <br />detection of 1.5 ppm in the 2-4' soil sample in boring GP-2, <br /> <br />. Groundwater was noted in all three borings from 3' to 5' below grade, <br /> <br />. Fill soils were noted throughout GP-I (12') and at a depth of 6' in GP-2 and GP-3. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />These results are also presented on the soil boring logs in Appendix B, <br /> <br />Soil Analytical Results <br />Laboratory analysis of soil samples collected are summarized below and are shown on Table I, <br />Appendix C contains the Legend report, <br />. DRO analysis of soil from GP-I (2-4'), GP-I (12') and GP-3 (2-4') showed <br />concentrations of 16 ppm, 110 ppm and 170 ppm, respectively, The DRO levels noted <br />were all identified by the laboratory as being atypical of petroleum products, The <br />chromatograms for these samples are attached to the Legend report, <br />. Analysis of soil from GP-I (12'), GP-2 (2-4'), GP-2 (7-8') and GP-3 (7-8') revealed no <br />coneentrations of DRO above the laboratory detection level. <br /> <br />. <br />