Laserfiche WebLink
<br />ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORKSESSION MINUTES <br />MARCH 18, 2002 <br /> <br />DRAFT <br /> <br />$10,000 can be thrown out with a community challenge to match it; and we could over <br />see money for next year. Mayor said we should go for another great event and believes <br />we can raise a lot of the money. <br /> <br />Aplikowski noted the staff time is an issue, Olson said she believes if staff does not get <br />paid for the time the involvement will be limited and staff needs incentive to be involved. <br />Aplikowski said she believes we should rename the day to include Arden Hills in the <br />name, Olson noted the committee suggested maybe having a name the day contest. <br />Terry noted all the past contributors will be in attendance at the upcoming business <br />luncheon. <br /> <br />Community Development <br /> <br />Planning/Zoning - TCAAP Developer Discussion - Mayor recapped which developers <br />have met with City Council to date. He also indicated he received a call from Weis <br />Builders and based on discussions they have decided they were not interested in <br />becoming a development partner. Ryan Companies have indicated their desire to give a <br />presentation but have since deiced against it. Mayor indicated he is unclear if Brakey's <br />Buidling and Development Corporation is interested. Opus may still be interested as <br />well. 3 options to go forward: select one team and go through the appropriate resolution; <br />2nd option: build our own team; 3Td option would be to make a decision to develop an <br />RFP and go through the formal process of selecting a team through that process. Mayor <br />would prefer not to go down path #3 because of the financial cost and time frame cost. <br />Joe 1. indicated an RFQ would be a shorter route to go down. Joe indicated this would at <br />least establish some kind of criteria for chosing a team if anyone would question the <br />choice. Mayor indicated he feels time is not our alley and he hopes Council will move <br />forward with this energeticly. Larson agreed moving forward quickly. Larson indicated <br />he feels comfortable with not have criteria set as Joe suggested with his RFQ and feels <br />they would have greater flexibility in dealing with the team if no firm criteria is set. <br />Parrish indicated there is some opportunity for the public's input on the process speaking <br />from the community "buy-in" prospective. Mayor noted he believes that the immediate <br />focus is the land transfer issue and the challenge is to find a team to help with the <br />transfer. Gregg indicated he believes there is a need for public polling, but he said it <br />believes will be a lot harder to do something similar to Apache because the TCAAP <br />redevelopment is not as tangible. Mayor said in theory we wouldn't probably use the <br />same team to develop all 500+ acres, Larson said maybe after the team has been chosen <br />then we go to the public to provide feedback on the proposed development plan. Mayor <br />said we may want to consider having some the teams entities contracted directly with the <br />city rather than the team, Aplikowski said she had some reservations ifthe Army will <br />truly let go ofthe land. Mayor said he believes a precidant being set with release ofland, <br />City Hall land is a good example, Mayor noted Alliant Tech has contacted him to meet <br />for discussion. <br /> <br />Rem wondered what trade offs we are going to have to give to acquire land. She noted <br />we are going to have to have more fire power than what the city currently has. She <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />2 <br /> <br />r <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />e <br />