Laserfiche WebLink
<br />ARDEN HILLS REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES <br />OCTOBER 27, 2003 <br /> <br />4 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />for Variance, to the November 10, 2003 Council Meeting at the request of <br />applicant. The motion carried unanimously (5-0). <br /> <br />B. PlanniDl! Case No. 03-26: Ramsev County Public Works, 1425 W. <br />Hil!hwav 96. Suecial Use Permit Amendment for Patrol Station <br />Addition <br /> <br />Mayor Aplikowski opened the public hearing at 7:27 p,m. <br /> <br />Mr. llellegers stated applicant was requesting a Special Use Permit Amendment <br />for a Patrol Station Addition. He noted the Planning Commission had made a <br />determination that in reviewing the proposed amendment to the Special Use <br />Pet1I1it, the Commission consider the effect of the proposed use upon the health, <br />safety, convenience and general welfare of the owners and occupants of <br />surrounding land, in particular, and the community as a whole. In addition, that <br />the facts and circumstances of the particular case warranted granting of the <br />amendment to the Special Use Permit. He indicated the Planning Commission had <br />approved the amendment with conditions as noted in staffs October 27, 2003 . <br />report. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden asked about the holding pond and what impact the SUP <br />Amendment would have on it. Mr. Hellegers replied the holding pond was <br />designed to be larger than what was needed, therefore this project should not make <br />an impact on the holding pond. <br /> <br />Councilmember Larson expressed concern about the water patrol cold storage <br />facility. He stated it would be difficult to screen, and the back side had no <br />windows that faced onto the National Guard property. He asked why it could not <br />be moved behind the cold storage on Highway 96, Mr. Hellegers replied part of <br />the building was considered to be an alternate use and would not be constructed at <br />this time. He indicated in the future, the National Guard had plans to place a <br />building close to the property line and that was the reason they would not add <br />screening along this building. <br /> <br />Councilmember Larson asked why the building couldn't be located more to the <br />north instead of along the property line. . <br />