My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 02-23-2004
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2004
>
CCP 02-23-2004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:19:24 PM
Creation date
11/14/2006 3:33:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
133
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION - FEBRUARY 4, 2004 <br /> <br />4 <br /> <br />Commissioner Modesette asked how many people were begin added in phase I without <br />Building ''J'' and "K". Mr. Brasch noted most of the space was training center, so it was <br />not intended for staffing. However, he noted it would accommodate approximately 250 - <br />350 additional people between the two buildings. He indicated for the training center, <br />approximately 50 percent of the people were already on site. He stated Building "N" <br />would accommodate 40-50 people. <br /> <br />Chair Sand asked when would Femwood be converted to the type of street as indicated <br />on their Master Plan. Mr. Brasch responded they hoped to start the reconstruction next <br />summer, but he did not know how far they would get this year. <br /> <br />Chair Sand requested Guidant give adequate notice to the residents when the street would <br />be reconstructed. Mr. Brasch replied they would notify the City when the construction <br />would begin so it could be published. <br /> <br />Chair Sand invited anyone for or against the variance to come forward and make <br />comment. <br /> <br />There were no comments from the public. <br /> <br />Chair Sand closed the public hearing at 7:34 p.m. <br /> <br />Commissioner Larson stated he wanted to be assured that Guidant did not add two many <br />people to this complex without having adequate on site parking. Mr. HeIlegers <br />responded parking ramp would start construction this summer and with those additional <br />parking spaces being added, it should be adequate to provide for the additional parking <br />spaces. He noted parking ramp 5 would be started when Building "K" was eompleted. <br /> <br />Mr. Parrish stated as Guidant added phases to this plan, parking would be analyzed and <br />there would need to be sufficient parking on the site to aecommodate the vehicles. He <br />stated traffic would be looked at the completion of each pbase. <br /> <br />Commissioner Zimmerman stated his concern was that they were losing parking with the <br />building addition and the loss of parking spaces with the construction of Ramp I, and he <br />was not assured that there would be sufficient parking. Mr. Hellegers replied if <br />additional parking spaees were needed short-term, the proof of parking area could be <br />converted into a parking area with little difficulty. <br /> <br />Commissioner Zimmerman asked who would monitor the parking situation. Mr. <br />Hellegers responded if this was a concern of the Planning Commission, staff could check <br />on the parking conditions and this could be added as a condition of approval. <br /> <br />Chair Sand asked with respect to the traffic study, did they had the option of authorizing <br />it prior to Building "K" being built or after Building "K" was built. Mr. Hellegers <br />responded they had the option of either. <br /> <br />Commissioner Ricke moved, seconded by Commissioner Zimmerman to recommend <br />approval of Planning Case No. 04-01: Guidant Corporation, 4100 Hamline Avenue; <br />Master Plan PUD Amendment and Final PUD for "Addition J" subject to the following <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.