Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />DRAFT <br /> <br />C.B.: We haven not talked to John Shardlow about any design profiles. <br />S.R.: The only meeting with Shardlow was one that City staff also attended. <br />The development team has been totally hands-off with Shardlow. <br /> <br />15) <br /> <br />Therewas a statement by a City Council member that CRR, a for-profit company, <br />was iil the TCAAP arrangement to make a profit. CRR interpreted this is as <br />members saying they were greedy, yet CRR was surprised that the congressional <br />delegation could misinterpret anything said during lobbying efforts when CRR <br />contacted them on the National Guard presentation. Can you explain the lack of <br />consisteney here? <br /> <br />16) <br /> <br />What do you feel your role as a partner is and how do you feel the City fits into <br />your definition? <br /> <br />This is not a "typical" developer-City relationship. Per the CRR discussion <br />outline: necd a relationship based on "Trust, Cooperation, Involvement, <br />Communication, Respect", See document entitled "TCAAP Reuse Project <br />May 2004" which lists Roles and Responsibilities and Key Tactics for <br />Success. <br /> <br />17) <br /> <br />Statements are made that there will be buildings/houses built and done by 2007, <br />Can you explain how and where this will happen? <br /> <br />No commitments have been made. But this scenario could happen; we are <br />hoping something is being built in three years. <br /> <br />18) CRR lobbying efforts seem to be reaetive instead of proactive. What <br />relationships have been developed with the Governor and PCA to assure the State <br />will sign off on the transfer? <br /> <br />The Development Team and City staff met with the MPCA Commissioner in <br />September, On December 3 there was a large meeting at the MPCA <br />ineluding the Development Team, City staff, MPCA, EP A (via phone), Army, <br />and others. On December 15 the City sent comments to the MPCA <br />regarding the Phase II study. Bart was able to discuss the project with the <br />Governor and bring him up to speed. The Development Team, City staff and <br />the Mayor mct with the Governor's General Counsel to start educating her <br />about the project, and she also attended the FOSET meeting. <br /> <br />19) How long do you feel CRR will be working on TCAAP before it is completely <br />developed? <br /> <br />C,B.: In his opinion, it could be 80% complete in 7 to 9 years, with total <br />build-out in 10-15 years. <br /> <br />\\Earth\Admin\City Administrator\TCAAP\5-10-04 Q&A Responses.doe <br />