My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-11-05
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
07-11-05
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/17/2012 10:46:46 AM
Creation date
11/14/2006 4:22:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
297
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />, . , <br /> <br />Building Ex~erior <br />A revised building rendering has also been included in the revised plans. The rendering shows . <br />the buildings as discussed at the June I st meeting, mostly brick with hardy board at the gables <br />and dormers. <br /> <br />Signage <br />Signage is being proposed to be limited to 30 square feet per unit which would be mounted on <br />the wall sign band. None of this wall signage would be backlit or internally illuminated. Small <br />external lights above the signage would illuminate the signs. In addition, each unit would have a <br />uniform name and address plaque of approximately I square foot next to the entrance door. <br />Finally, the applicant has requested that the building with nnits 26-30 be allowed to have one <br />sign of 60 square feet facing Highway 96 (the north side of the building). An elevation has been <br />included which shows an example of how the 60 square foot sign might look. <br /> <br />Use <br />The applicant has agreed that residential and restaurant uses not be allowed in the development. <br />The applicant has also agreed that there will be no retail uses except for incidental/accessory <br />sales. <br /> <br />Plan Review or anv chanlles since the June 1. 2005 meetinll: <br /> <br />A. Zoning - NB regulations call for developments to be reviewed in spirit and intent of the <br />Planned Unit Development process. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />As part of the PUD there are certain things which may not meet some City standards. In the <br />spirit of the PUD process the applicant may offset some of these deviations from City standard <br />by including additional elements. Following is a breakdown of the PUD issues. <br /> <br />PUD Chart <br /> <br />Deviations from City standard Additional Elements to Offset Deviations <br />- Reduced parking setbacks from - A freestanding monument style SIgn <br />the northern property line. (versus pylon/pole mounted sign). <br />- One sign that is 60 sf where 30 sf - landscaping approximately double of the <br />is permitted. City's landscaping standards. <br />- Wall sign lighting; internal for - Preservation of additional trees along the <br />the 60 sf sign, external for other west property line (have not been included <br />wall signage where the standards in the landscaping calculations). <br />would call for no sign lighting. <br />- landscape lot area I % less than - Exceptional design and use of superior <br />the City standard of35%. building materials. <br /> <br />\\Earth\Planning\Planning Cases\2005\05-1 2 Arden Hills Office Park - Royal Oaks Realty - pun, Preliminary Plat for Old City Hall & PW Site . <br />(PENDfNG)\07-06-05 PC Report Royal Oaks OS-12.doc <br /> <br />Page 20[8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.