Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />I. The suhmitted survey was prepared hy a registered land surveyor and meets City <br />requirements. <br />2. As noted above, the proposed lots mcet all requirements of the underlying R-2 <br />Zone. <br />3, The proposed subdivision and consolidation is unlikely to have any negative affect <br />on the public welfare. The previously platted lots were less than 5,000 square feet, <br />which is below the 11,000 square foot minimum lot size. The consolidation will <br />removc the potential that the originally platted 5,000 square foot lots would be <br />developed individually. The proposed lots are comparable to and compatible with <br />neighboring lots within the subdivision. Finally, if a dwelling is constructed on the <br />lot, it would contrihute to the local tax hase without significantly taxing the existing <br />infrastructure since the lot already has access to City infrastructure. <br />4, The applicant has met all other applicable requirements of the Subdivision <br />Ordinance. The applicant has provided the necessary cascmcnts and access for the <br />property, There is sufficient buildable space on the proposed lot for construction <br />without a variance. <br />5, All required application fees have been paid. This subdivision does result in the <br />creation of one new residential lot. Under Section 1130.08 of the Subdivision <br />Ordinance, the park dedication fee would apply to this casc, Thc Recreation and <br />Conservation portion (Subd. 2) requires that all subdivisions dedicate a portion of <br />their land for recreation and conservation purposes or, as deemed comparable value <br />by the City Council, pay a park dedication fce in place of a land dedication. <br /> <br />Although the applicant is not proposing a land dedication, a subdivision rcsulting in <br />one new residential lot would require a land dedication of six percent, which would <br />be .09 acres or 4,025 square feet. Given the small size ofthe potential land <br />dedication and the availability of other nearby park facilities, a park dedication fee <br />may be more appropriate then a land dedication. In lieu of the land dedication, the <br />City Council may require the applicant to pay, as an equivalent contribution, an <br />amount in cash equal to the percentage of the land required to be dedicated, <br />multiplied by the fair market value of the property at the time of the final approval <br />of the subdivision, <br /> <br />Should a fee be accepted in lieu of a land dedication, the park dedication fee would <br />bc six percent of the land val ue of the property at the time of final approval ofthe <br />subdivision, The 2006 market value according to Ramsey County records is <br />$607,500. This value would result in a park dedication fee of$36,390. The <br />Planning Commission may recommend a course of action to the City Council <br />regarding a land dedication or park dedication fee. <br /> <br />City of Arden Hills <br />Planning Commission Meetingfor Februwy 1, 2006 <br /> <br />\\Metro-inet.us\ardcnhills\Planning\Planning Cases\2006\06-004 Odd fellows Minor Subdivision\012406 - PC Report - Oddfcllows Minor <br />Subdivision Report.doc <br /> <br />Page 4 of 6 <br />