My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 03-20-2006
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2006
>
CCP 03-20-2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:21:25 PM
Creation date
11/15/2006 10:09:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
80
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />2006 PMP Update <br />3/J 6/2006 <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />have enthusiastically supported the inclusion of the rain gardens. The use of rain gardens <br />will not eliminate the need for a storm sewer system, but will aid in improving the water <br />quality and will potentially reduce the size of pipe needed for the storm sewer. <br /> <br />Rain gardens are areas where storm water is captured and allowed to infiltrate into the <br />ground. They are shallow (<32", usually <8" for residential) depressions, typically planted <br />with water absorbing native plants, strategically located to collect, infiltrate, and filtrate rain <br />that falls on hard surfaces like roofs, driveways, alleys, or streets to minimize negative <br />impacts of excessive runoff from these surfaces on lakes and streams. URS has identified <br />approximately fifteen areas in the neighborhood that would be suitable for a rain garden. The <br />rain gardens would be constructed to overflow back into the street, to prevent yards and <br />homes from flooding. <br /> <br />Staff requests that Council consider the maintenance of these rain gardens. Other cities, such <br />as Maplewood and Bumsville, have prepared maintenance agreements between the city and <br />the property owner. The document would indicate that the plants will be paid for by the City, <br />that a conservation easement would be placed over the area, and the property owner would be <br />required to maintain the rain garden. Would Council be in favor of preparing similar <br />agreements with property owners? <br /> <br />Arden Hills Island Beach Club Assessment <br /> <br />At the December 19,2005 work session, Council had asked staff to research past projects <br />where associations were assessed. In the February 24, 2006 Administrator's Update, you <br />were provided with documentation regarding the assessment of the Josephine Hills <br />Association and the resulting appeals. <br /> <br />In evaluating whether or not to assess the Arden Hills lsland Beach Club, the following <br />information should be considered: <br /> <br />In 2003, the assessment policy was to assess properties on a front footage basis. The <br />assessment policy was changed in 2004 to assess properties on a per lot basis. The <br />assessment policy is based on 50% of the costs of one half of the street. <br /> <br />The 2003 assessment that was appealed by the Josephine Hills Association and exempted <br />by Council was in the amount of$4,512.00. The potential assessment for the Arden Hills <br />lsland Beach Club is at $6,500 per lot, with the Beach Club being assessed for an <br />equivalent of 12 lots. This amounts to $78,000. <br /> <br />If the Beach Club is not assessed, the assessment rate for the surrounding properties will <br />increase to $8,800. The exemption of the Josephine Hills Association's assessment did <br />not affect the amount ofthe assessment to the other properties. <br /> <br />Assessment Schedule <br /> <br />In the past, properties have been assessed prior to the construction of the project. These <br />assessments have been based on the estimated costs of construction. At the December 19, <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.