My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2005
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
Commissions, Committees, and Boards
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Minutes
>
PC Minutes 2005
>
2005
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:28:27 PM
Creation date
2/15/2007 9:24:34 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
81
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> . ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION - SEPTEMBER 7, 2005 4 <br /> . Commissioner McClung stated there was no interest from the Commission to come back <br /> and ente11ain variances for setbacks, etc. Mr. Kotoski stated he would not be coming <br /> back and request any variances for the homes because the pads were large enough to <br /> build on. <br /> Commissioner Larson stated he would not entertain a variance for decks or patios either. <br /> Mr. Kotoski responded a variance for these types of amenities would not he necessary. <br /> Chair Sand closed the public hearing at 7:38 p.m. <br /> Commissioner Larson stated the Planning Commission has made a iinding that the <br /> proposed variances arc not merely inconveniences, the conditions upon which the <br /> variances are based are unique to the property, and the variances will not be substantially <br /> detrimental to the puhlic welfare and are in concert with City regulations. <br /> Commissioner Larson moved, seconded by Commissioner Bezdicek to recommend <br /> approval of Plalming Case No. 05-19, Richard Kotoski and Kim Bryson d/h/a Bryson <br /> Woods, 2233 Dellwood Street, Roseville, MN; Preliminary Plat (1978 Thom Drive) <br /> subject to the conditions as outlined in staff's September 7, 2005 report, the addition of <br /> the fifth condition for removal of structures, and adding the following conditions: That a <br /> grading and drainage plan must be submitted to the City for review prior to the issuance <br /> of any building permits; and ?? <br /> . Commissioner Zimmerman stated he did not feel this was consistent with the rest of the <br /> neighborhood and he did not believe the lots were large enough to work. He stated <br /> applicant had demonstrated that a house would fit on Lot 1 and Lot 1 fell within their <br /> guidelines. He stated he was not concerned about this because of the shape of the lot. <br /> The motion calTied (5-1 Commissioner Zimmerman opposed). <br /> B. PLANNING CASE 05-20: PAUL RUPPEL. 1541 MILLPOND CT.. CHASKA. <br /> MN: FIVE-FOOT SIDE YARD SETBACK VARIANCE FOR A DETACHED <br /> GARAGE (1911 GLENPAUL A VENUE) <br /> Mr. Hellegers stated applicant was requesting a five-foot side yard setback variance for a <br /> new detached garage in approximately the same location as the existing garage. Stall <br /> recommended approval of the five-foot side yard setback for a new detached garage after <br /> making the findings that the variance meets the hardship criteria and would not have an <br /> adverse impact on sUlTounding properties or the City as a whole. <br /> Commissioner Larson asked if this lot were clear and a new home was built on this site, <br /> what would be the garage space required. Mr. Hellegers replied there was no minimum <br /> garage space requirement, but from a functional standpoint, it would not be practical. <br /> Commissioner McClung stated if a new home was built today, it would probably have an <br /> . attached garage. <br /> Commissioner Larson stated in the community where he worked, they required a <br /> minimum of two car garage. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.