Laserfiche WebLink
<br />What issues/concerns do you have with the concepts presented tonight? <br /> <br />. I'm concerned about the trailer park and the cost of buying them out (or whatever) to <br />build a big road right through the middle. Why not route traffic through TCAAP land <br />instead? (Flop the 96/10 curve to TCAAP instead.) <br />. Access from Snelling Avenue going west on 96 due to backup of traffic at North <br />Heights and TCAAP 96 entry. <br />. Give good deals to the families that will have to move. <br />. 1 want to decrease traffic on Hamline & Lexington. <br />. Prefer Concept 2. <br />. With global warming becoming a major issue of our time, why not encourage some <br />sort of public transit, car-parking, and electric cars. <br />. Preserve Old Highway 1 O/Snelling Avenue for the present residents. <br />. No cost to locals %. <br />. Very sloppy presentations. Left on option out of the discussion; lots of major <br />mistakes on illustrations; assumptions presented as fact with respect to environmental <br />impact of option 3. The analysis is deliberately slanted; option 3 mizht have more <br />cleanup cost and mizht require more time to get permits but we are being asked to <br />make a decision anyway. Obviously the deck has been stacked in favor of option 2. <br />Option 2 might be the best choice but option 3 is just presented as a "straw man" <br />alternative to make option 2 look good in comparison. <br />. Split diamond #3 just increases wait times with the traffic lights. #2 is most <br />reasonable if we must maintain access to 1 0 from 96. <br />. The least damage to the trailer park would seem the better way. <br />. I thought the presentations were well thought out. I would favor the second proposal <br />but would like to see Highway 96 go over Highway 10 rather than under. The same <br />for the entrance to the new development into the TMAC. <br />. (slow down) on 10. Would like to see speed at 45 miles instead of 50. <br />. At present I encounter only two signalized intersections on 96 between Snelling and <br />Old Highway 8 in New Brighton, which will increase to as many as 5. However, this <br />is a lesser inconvenience than will be experienced by homeowner/residents who will <br />be displaced by future roads necessary to make 10 a freeway. <br />. I prefer concept #2 <br /> <br />