Laserfiche WebLink
<br />10/23/2007 <br />Page 2 <br /> <br /> Barr Engineering Bonestroo URS <br />Review ofRI/RAP $24,000 $46,000 $16,080 <br />Additional services $6,000 $2,256 <br />included as part of <br />contract amount <br />Optional services $13,500 <br />Proposed contract total $24,000/$37,500 $52,000 $18,336 <br /> <br />Based on the review of the submittals, staff is recommending that the City contract with Barr Engineering <br />for this work. While Barr did not provide the lowest proposal, they have the most TCAAP related <br />experience of the three firms, which will prove beneficial as the development progresses. Barr also <br />provided the most comprehensive proposal, outlining several additional options the City may want to <br />consider with this type ofa redevelopment project. Staff recommends accepting all of Barr's optional <br />services as well; these services will be provided on a time and materials basis, and the costs provided are <br />a not to exceed amount. The City can choose to move on to Task 5 upon the completion of Task 4; if we <br />feel there are additional questions or concerns. <br /> <br />In the tasks to review the RI and RAP, Barr and URS identified the need for meetings with staff to discuss <br />the reports and results. Barr has allotted more meetings within these tasks, indicating their commitment <br />to make sure City staff and other representatives fully understand the results. Barr's review process is the <br />most iterative process of all three proposals, demonstrating their understanding that ongoing <br />communication with City staff is vital. URS stated in their proposal that extended review or negotiations <br />would be outside the scope of their proposal and would be an additional cost. <br /> <br />Staff called the City of New Brighton to discuss their experience with Barr on various projects, including <br />the Northwest Quadrant redevelopment, which involved TCAAP related clean-up efforts and working <br />with the Army. New Brighton staff spoke very highly of Barr's staff and project deliverables. They <br />discussed Barr's strength in outlining options for the City to consider with issues as the project evolves <br />and changes arise, as well as assisting with phasing projects into more manageable pieces. Barr has a <br />well-developed relationship with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA), and has represented <br />the City of New Brighton's interests and concerns well at meetings with MPCA staff. <br /> <br />The proposals are also attached for your review. <br /> <br />RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION <br /> <br />Motion to Authorize Staff to Contract with Barr Engineering Company for the Review of the <br />Environmental Characterization ofthe TCAAP property. <br />