My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-07-07-WS/PC
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
Commissions, Committees, and Boards
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
2004-2009
>
PC Packets 2007
>
11-07-07-WS/PC
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/12/2015 12:24:36 PM
Creation date
11/1/2007 3:46:16 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
134
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />boats, such as pontoons, in the water all summer, and regulating how these are stored <br />will be dealt with in the Shoreland Management Ordinance; however, once these <br />watercraft are brought on land they will fall under the purview of this ordinance, and <br />must be stored at least ten feet from the ordinary high water mark. <br /> <br /> <br />Staff Recommendation <br />Staff recommends maintaining the current code prohibiting RV storage within fifty <br />feet from the lake, and permitting water-oriented RVs to be stored as near as ten feet <br />from the ordinary high water mark, as is written in the proposed code. <br /> <br />DNR Regulations <br /> <br />8. Staff spoke with Ramsey County's water hydrologist with the DNR, and the DNR <br />does not have any specific regulations or preferences as to where boats, boatlifts, or <br />other such devises are stored when on shore. They do regulate the location of water <br />oriented structures (i.e. boathouses), but not vehicles. The DNR hydrologist did not <br />have a concern over water quality being impacted by the proximity of these vehicles <br />to the lake. <br /> <br />Variance Criteria <br /> <br />At the October 3Td Planning Commission Meeting, the Commission came 10 a <br />consensus 1hat the conditional use permit process should be removed from the <br />proposed ordinance. However, as with others parts of the Zoning Code, property <br />owners could still apply for a variance in nnique situations. <br /> <br />9. Currently, the variance process requires applicants to show that an undue hardship, <br />not created by the property owner, is present in order to gran1 the variance. This <br />criterion is set by State Statute. Based on the S1ate Statutes, it seems unlikely that a <br />variance for any RV, regardless of situation, would be possible because the property <br />owner is the one who purchased the RV, thus creating the need for the variance. <br />However, s1aff acknowledges that in creating this new RV ordinance, there will be <br />properties on which, because of the setback requirements and other regulations, the <br />storage of an RV is impossible. With this knowledge, i1 is possible to create a <br />specific set of criteria for gran1ing an RV variance that would permi1 alternative <br />locations for s10rage if issues such as lot configuration or topographic features <br />prohibited normal location regulations to be met. <br /> <br />10. Regardless of the criteria that are decided upon, the variance process can be <br />administered one of two ways; the process can be an administrative one, issued by <br />City S1aff based on the determined set of criteria, or be a variance process similar to <br />other variances that required review from the Planning Commission and City Council. <br /> <br />City of Arden Hills <br />Planning Commission Work Session for November 7, 2007 <br /> <br />\\Ahdocsl\AH\AHdatalPlanoinglPlanning Cases\2007\07-025 RV Regalalions Zoning Amendment <br />(PENDING)\II0703 - PC Work Session - RV Ordinance. doc <br /> <br />Page 6 of7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.