Laserfiche WebLink
<br />ADEQUACY OF INTERNAL TRAFFIC AND P ARKlNG OPERA nONS (QUESTION C) <br /> <br />We reviewed the adequacy of the current site plan with respect to the following five items: <br /> <br />1. Overall adequacy of proposed parking supply <br />11. Relatively high parking demand at the south end of the site <br />lll. Head-in parking along the east edge ofthe existing retail building <br />IV, Drive-through queuing for the proposed pharmacy <br />v. For the County Road E driveway, the spacing between County Road E and the first access <br />serving the pharmacy drive-through and parking. <br /> <br />Results of our review regarding each of the above four items are presented next: <br /> <br />i_ Overall adequacy of proposed parking supply, Our parking review was based on the City's <br />Zoning Code requirements and data presented in the Institute of Transportation Engineers' <br />Parking Generation, Third Edition, Results of our review are presented next. <br /> <br />o The Zoning Code presents a parking requirement for "retail sales," which applies <br />to all ofthe proposed and existing retail uses_ The Code requires one space for <br />each 150 SF of gross retail sales floor space. From information provided to us, <br />the total estimated retail sales floor area is 78,052 SF. For this area, the total <br />number of spaces required on the site as per the zoning code is 521 (78,052 <br />divided by ] 50). The Zoning Code states that "the number of spaces required for <br />a specific use may be reduced ifthe owner or occupant provides documentation <br />that a lesser number of spaces will actually be needed than normally required by <br />this Code and the City Council authorizes such lesser number after <br />recommendation by the Planning Commission." Parking demand calculations <br />based on current industry standards are presented next. <br /> <br />o The ITE Parking Generation, 2004 presents parking data collected at numerous <br />developments throughout the United States. These data present separate peak period <br />demand data for pharmacy, supermarket, and general retail uses. Table 3 shows <br />parking demand calculations for the proposed redevelopment based on ITE data. <br /> <br />Table 3 <br />Parking Demand Calculations (based on ITE Parking Generation, Third Edition) <br /> <br />Use Size Average Peak Period Parking Demand (Satnrday4) <br />(ITE Land Use Code) (floor area) Rate Nnmber of Spaces <br />Existing retail (820) 55,500 SF 2.97 spaces per 1,000 SF 165 <br />Pharmacv (880) 14,490 SF 2,1 spaces per 1,000 SF 31 <br />Supermarket (850) 16,230 SF 4,75 spaces per t ,000 SF 78 <br />Retail (820) 14,300 SF 2_97 spaces per t ,000 SF 43 <br /> TOTAL 317 <br /> <br />4 For all uses on the site upon completion ofthe proposed redevelopment, peak period parking demand on a Saturday is greater <br />than peak demand on a typical weekday. <br /> <br />14 <br />