My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-03-09-PC
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
Commissions, Committees, and Boards
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
2004-2009
>
PC Packets 2009
>
06-03-09-PC
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/13/2015 4:24:32 PM
Creation date
5/29/2009 8:34:42 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
109
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
While the discussion at the meeting touched many aspects of the proposal, notable comments <br />and concerns included: <br />1. Requiring decorative fencing along Lexington Avenue (no chain link <br />fencing); <br />2. Being cautious with grading along Lexington Avenue, particular in the <br />footprint of the future Building 4 to ensure that it is not a hazard and is <br />properly landscaped and maintained; <br />3. Try to construct ADA access from the County Road E/Lexington Avenue <br />intersection to the Walgreen's store; <br />4. Redesign the traffic flow in the Walgreen's parking lot to provide for one-way <br />traffic movement in a counter -clockwise fashion; <br />5. Limit the signage on the buildings to what is allowed in the Sign Code; <br />6. Ensure that the landscaping plan conforms to the City's requirements; <br />7. The internal pedestrian flow has greatly improved from the original proposal; <br />8. The cluster of store fronts is more inviting than the original proposal. <br />Points one through six have been included on the plans or included in the conditions of <br />approval. <br />C. Building Official, Fire Marshal, and Civil Engineer <br />The Building Official did not have any comments on the project. A letter dated May 14, <br />2009, from the Fire Marshal is included in Attachment B. The Civil Engineer did not <br />provide any comments but the final grading and utility plans will be subject to Engineer <br />approval prior to the issuance of any permits. <br />D. Ramsey County Review <br />Ramsey County submitted their comments in the letter dated May 18, 2009 (Attachment B). <br />Point one of the letter notes that at their discretion, Ramsey County could eliminate the left <br />out movement onto County Road E from Arden Plaza. This would make the access point a <br />right -in, right -out movement only. The County is not moving forward with such a limitation <br />at this time. <br />Point two of the letter states that the County is not supportive of a new traffic signal on <br />County Road E with the current request. The City and applicant will continue discussions <br />with the County as future phases move forward. The traffic signal will also depend on what <br />happens with the former Holiday Inn property to the north. <br />Finally, point three states that future improvements to the County Road E and Lexington <br />Avenue intersection may be needed to accommodate future development in this area. As part <br />of these improvements, Ramsey County is suggesting that additional right-of-way be <br />required to accommodate an additional turning lane. Based on discussions with the City <br />City of Arden Hills <br />Planning Commission Meeting for June 3, 2009 <br />IlMetro-inet.uslardenhillslPlanninglPlanning Cases 12009109-011 Arden Plaza PUD and Plat (pending)1060309 - PCReport -Arden Plaza - <br />Master PUD.doc Page 13 of 17 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.