Laserfiche WebLink
<br />May 28, 2009 <br />Page 3 <br />WWW.RYANCOMPANIES.COM <br /> <br />~YAN@ <br /> <br />BUILDING LASTING RELATIONSHIPS <br /> <br />b. TH 10 @ TCAAP - $343.00 - no detail on the invoice, it shows staff time at 4.0 hours, <br />please provide backup <br />c. I35W /CR H - $567.00 - no detail on the invoice, it shows staff time at 4.5 hours, please <br />provide backup <br />4. Bolton and Menk Invoice dated 8/29/08 <br />a. TH 10 @ TCAAP - $252.00. Unaware of any work, please provide backup. <br />5. Bolton and Menk Invoice dated 7/30/08: <br />a. TH 10/CSAH 96 - $1,200 - unaware of what was done, please provide backup <br />6. Chris Giga invoice 7/1 to 9/30/08 - $1,467.31 - Please provide hours associated with grade <br />separation. This should not be charged to TCAAP <br />7. Bolton and Menk Invoice dated 12/31/08 <br />a. TH10/CSAH 96 - $1,008 - grade separation is not a TCAAP issue <br />b. I35W /CR H - $570.00 - Unaware of any work, please provide backup <br />8. Giga/Bloom invoice dated 10/1-12/31/08 - $287.18 - please provide backup, no design work was <br />being done during this time and grade separation is not a TCAAP issue. <br />9. Barr Engineering Invoice dated 12/2/08 - $764.42 - Task 002 - "Begin drafting confidentiality <br />agreement in preparation of reviewing RI reports" Comment: We (City and RRLD) agreed that <br />Barr was not reviewing RI Task 005 - "Attendance at the TCAAP technical review committee <br />meeting on 10/7/08" Comment: We (City and RRLD) agreed Tom Reppe would attend so if <br />City decided to s.end someone" it would be at their cost <br />10. Barr Engineering Invoice dated 6/16/08 - $5,014.02 - "Task 005 Continuing Advice" - Please <br />provide more detail. <br /> <br />Ehlers and Associates (Financial Consultant) - $4,648.25 <br />1. 10/10/08 Invoice: Update Utility study for 2008 budget - $138.75 - Why are we getting charged for <br />an update for the 2008 budget? TCAAP was not going to be developed for another 2-3 years. <br />2. 11/10/08 Invoice - 9 hours or $1,845 - "various discussions" line items with no details, please <br />provide additional details. <br />3. 12/10/08 Invoice - 1.75 hours or $358.75 - "various discussions" line items with no details, please <br />provide additional details. <br />4. 7 /15/08 Invoice - 2.75 hours or $563.75 - "various discussions" line items with no details, please <br />provide additional details. <br />5. 1/9/09 Invoice - TCAAP Resource Study - .75 hours or $138.75 - "Updated FY07 FMP"- what is <br />this and why are we being charged for a fiscal year 2007 expens,e? <br />6. 12/10/08 Invoice - Project: Storm Water Utility Rate Study $1,110 - Two issues: 1. why are we <br />being charged for a storm water study? We are handling that with our consultants 2. If this was mis- <br />labeled and should be Utility Rate study we were charge for 1000/0 rather than the 300/0 outlined in <br />Sue Iverson's 10/15/08 email to me. <br /> <br />j:\PROJ-NEW\900\900\900-909 TCAAP 2003\ARDEN HILLS-TCAAP\PURSUIT COSTS\PDA BILLINGS\PDA COST OBJECTION LEITER TO MOORSE 4.23.09.DOC IE <br />