My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1E, TCAAP Reimbursable Expenditures
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2009
>
07-20-09-WS
>
1E, TCAAP Reimbursable Expenditures
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2009 10:36:54 AM
Creation date
7/17/2009 10:33:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Document
TCAAP Reimbursable Expenditures
General - Type
TCAAP Reimbursable Expenditures
Date
7/20/2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />May 28, 2009 <br />Page 4 <br /> <br />~YAN@ <br /> <br />WWW.RYANCOIv1PANlES.COM <br /> <br />BUILDING LASTING RELATIONSHIPS <br /> <br />7. 12/2/08 Invoice - $83.25 - 2008 sewer and water rate study - meeting with staff on final rates for <br />Council - why are we being charged for fmal rates when the TCAAP development has not occurred? <br />8. 1/9/09 Invoice - 2 hours or $410 - "various discussions" line items with no details, please provide <br />additional details. <br /> <br />Additional City Staff - $5,983.14 <br />Salary and Fringe costs for Office Support for July through December. This reflects 8 hours/week or 270 <br />hours. Question: What activities were performed by the office support staff that allowed the <br />Planning or CD Director to devote additional time to TCAAP? In addition during November and <br />December 2008 we asked to stop development activities to figure out economic viability issues with the <br />negotiating team. This did not include any Planning/CD activities. In addition, the PDA (section 5.2(i)) <br />required that the City and Developer to agree on hourly rates for these activities. There was no such <br />agreement, and the invoice detail provides no detail with respect to how many hours were spent. The only <br />detail is a lump sum dollar amount. <br /> <br />March 23, 2009 Invoice - Amount in Question $6,023.32 <br /> <br />Engineering Services - $455.00 <br />. Bolton and Menk Invoice dated 2/27/09 - $455 - TH10/CSAH 96 - 3.5 hours, $455 - Question: <br />grade separation is not a TeAAP issue. <br /> <br />Ehlers & Associates - Financial Advisory Services - $2,520 <br />1. 2/10/09 Invoice - 3.75 hours, $787.50 - "various discussions" line items with no details, please <br />provide additional details. <br />2. 3/10/09 Invoice -- 8.25 hours, $1,732.50 - "various discussions" and "various discussions & 2 <br />conference calls" - please provide details on discussions and who were the conference calls with? <br /> <br />Peterson, Fram & Bergman Gerry Filla) - $44.00 <br />. "legal research re: gifts to public officials - research TCAAP funds - $44.00 - Question: what is this <br />and why is RRLD being charged? <br /> <br />Additional City Staff - $3,004.32 <br />"Bill Ryan for $3,004.32 for office support staff costs for 1sr quarter of 2009". Comment: per the PDA, <br />this was intended to supplement planning and CD director during which time they would be <br />spending on TCAAP. During the first quarter, there were no planning activities related to TCAAP. <br />The entire quarter was spent trying to determine solutions to solve the land value issues.. In <br />addition, the PDA (section 5.2(i)) required that the City and Developer to agree on hourly rates for these <br />activities. There was no such agreement, and the invoice detail provides. no detail with respect to how many <br />hours were spent. The only detail is a lump sum dollar amount. <br /> <br />J:\PROJ-NEW\900\900\900-909 TCAAP 2003\ARDEN HILLS-TCAAP\PURSUIT COSTS\PDA BILLINGS\PDA COST OBJECTION LEITER TO MOORSE 4.23.09.DOC IE <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.