My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7B, Clarification on 2010 PMP Action
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2010
>
01-25-10-R
>
7B, Clarification on 2010 PMP Action
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/24/2024 9:53:29 AM
Creation date
1/25/2010 8:16:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Document
Clarification on 2010 PMP Action
General - Type
Clarification on 2010 PMP Action
Date
1/25/2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Schedule Implications <br />Proj ects using State Aid funding must be submitted to State Aid for their review. In <br />previous years, the review turnaround typically ranged from two to four weeks. This past <br />year, cities have observed the review period to have taken as long as six weeks. The 26- <br />foot wide design is what would need to be reviewed by State Aid. The proposed proj ect <br />schedule does allow four weeks for State Aid review; however, if there is a backlog at <br />State Aid, there may be future delays. If MSA funds are not used on this proj ect, it is <br />anticipated that the bidding schedule could be advanced to early March. <br />Assessments <br />As detailed in the feasibility report, the street width of Valentine Avenue affected the <br />proposed assessment rate for streets being reconstructed. The table below lists the <br />estimated assessment rate per residential equivalent units (REU) for each option. <br />Type of Improvement Number of REUs Estimated Assessment Rate <br />Reconstruction (24-foot width) 31 $8,656 <br />Reconstruction (26-foot width) 31 $ 8, 8 3 3 <br />Resident Comments/Concerns <br />At the neighborhood meeting, several comments and concerns were raised by the <br />residents concerning street width and parking. <br />Residents expressed concerns about speeding and through traf�c on Valentine Avenue. In <br />response to these concerns, the feasibility report also provided an option for a 24 foot <br />wide road. However, this design would not allow the City to use State Aid funds on this <br />proj ect. <br />Residents had mixed responses about the need for on-street parking; many did not have <br />concerns, while others would like to see on-street parking available at all times after the <br />proj ect is complete. A 26-foot wide street using MSA funds would be required to be <br />posted no parking on both sides of the street at all times. Parking restrictions would be at <br />the discretion of the City Council if the street were constructed to a width of 24 feet and <br />MSA funds are not used. However, the Lake Johanna Fire Department has expressed <br />concerns about narrow streets, and have requested that streets less than 26 feet wide be <br />posted no parking at all times to ensure emergency vehicle access to properties. <br />In the interest of keeping the residents on Valentine Avenue informed, staff recommends <br />that they be noti� ed if modi� cations are made to the design. <br />Council Action Requested <br />Provide direction to staff on how to proceed with the final design for the 2010 PMP. <br />City Council Meeting <br />\�1Vletro-inet.us\ardenhills�.Admin\Council�Agendas & Packet Information\2010\O 1-25-10 Regular�Packet Information\7B 1- <br />25-lOMemo 2010PMP MSA.doc <br />Page 2 of 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.