Laserfiche WebLink
11. Independent, assisted, and skilled nursing care is currently provided on site, as approved <br />by the City. <br />12. Independent senior housing, once defined as Institutional housing, is now better defined <br />as a multiple family use, which is not permitted in the R -2 District. <br />13. The application is proposing to rezone the property to R -4 Multiple Dwelling District. <br />14. The proposed redevelopment, and mix of uses, is a permitted use in the R -4 District with <br />an approved PUD. <br />15. Rezoning the property to R -4 would bring it into conformance with the Zoning Code. <br />16. The R -2 and R -4 Districts are substantially similar in terms of development standards. <br />17. The rezoning will not negatively impact the surrounding neighborhoods or the <br />community as a whole and is in keeping with the intent of the Zoning Code, because the <br />use, previously approved by the City, has existed on the property for several decades with <br />no negative effects. <br />18. The proposed rezoning is not in conflict with the Comprehensive Plan or the future land <br />use designation of the property. <br />19. The proposed rezoning and use would not be incompatible with the adjacent land uses <br />because the traffic and parking impacts of a senior housing facility are substantially less <br />than that of a non -age restricted housing facility, and the facility has existed for decades <br />at its current intensity of use with no ill effects on the surrounding community. <br />Preliminary and Final Plat Findings: <br />20. The application conforms to all requirements of the City's Subdivision Ordinance. <br />PUD Review Findings: <br />21. While the City's design standards for the B2 District do not apply to this development, <br />given that this project is a PUD Staff has reviewed the proposal against the design <br />standards and found that they are substantially met or exceeded by this application. <br />22. The application is in conformance with the sign regulations within the City Code. <br />23. The application is in substantial conformance with the requirements of the City's Zoning <br />Code for the proposed R -4 District, except where indicated in this report. <br />24. The applicant is requesting flexibility from the Zoning Code through the PUD process on <br />building height and density. <br />25. The height of the primary building would be 52 feet. The roof line variegates and the <br />height of the building nearest to adjacent properties would be 36 feet. <br />26. The existing density on site is 17.6 units per acre; the proposed density would be 18.2 <br />units per acre. <br />27. In exchange for zoning flexibility, the applicant is proposing a number of items in excess <br />of the Zoning Code requirements; such as, excess open space, tree and perennial <br />plantings, storm water treatment and management, increased setbacks, enhanced design <br />elements and building material quality. <br />28. The application will not create a negative impact on the immediate area or the community <br />as a whole because the facility has operated on the site since 1955; the land use of the site <br />City of Arden Hills <br />City Council Meeting for November 29, 2010 <br />C: IDOCUME -1I MEAGAN I.BEEILOCALS- 11Temp1ELF20101124 083818111 -29 -10 Regular Meeting Pres Homes Memo.doc <br />Page 7 of 10 <br />