Laserfiche WebLink
Planning and Zoning Commission <br />July 2, 2002 <br />Meeting Minutes <br /> <br />Commissioner DeVine indicated he did not think it would be any more than five years. <br /> <br />Council Member Travis indicated there would be possible construction next year to the <br />point just past the Dairy Queen. He then asked why access could not be taken off of <br />Cedar. <br /> <br />Mr. Evans asked what the plan for that small piece of property was. <br /> <br />Commissioner Wilharber indicated it was a tax forfeited piece of property acquired by <br />the City and there has been discussion of putting a water tower on it, turning it into a park <br />and/or selling it but as of now there is no plan for it. <br /> <br />Commissioner Wilharber indicated that Cedar is a gravel road and the citizens that live <br />on it would be upset with heavy traffic. He also pointed out that Cedar is in Lino Lakes. <br /> <br />The Commission agreed that the concept looked good and recommended working with <br />City Staff to firm up the details and requirements. <br /> <br />Mr. Thompson indicated their goal is to construct the 20,000 square foot building and <br /> <br />work with Staff to develop a plan for the rest of the property. <br /> <br />IV. PUBLIC HEARING(S) <br /> <br />1. Sheehy Construction Company Lot Split Request (20 Acre Parcel into 5 & 15 <br />st <br />Acre Parcels), 7047 South 21 Avenue. <br /> <br />Chair Hanson opened the public hearing at 7:20 p.m. <br /> <br />Larry Nielson, attorney for Mr. Sheehy was in attendance to answer any questions of the <br />Commission. <br /> <br />Commissioner Wilharber asked whether Staff had received any feedback from those <br />noticed for the hearing. <br /> <br />Ms. Moore-Sykes indicated she had not received any feedback on this matter. <br /> <br />Council Member Travis asked if there were assessments against the property. <br /> <br />Mr. Nielson indicated that there were assessments against the property and indicated that <br />his client would like to have those split between the two parcels. <br /> <br />Council Member Travis indicated that he did not think that the County would be willing <br />to record the lot split until the assessments were paid. <br /> <br />Page 4 of 7 <br />