My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1996-12-11 - CC Packet
Centerville
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1996-2022
>
1996
>
1996-12-11 - CC Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/30/2011 10:27:45 AM
Creation date
8/30/2011 10:27:41 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
49
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Council Meeting November 13, 1996 <br /> to know where his money is going. Mr. Goertz stressed his interest in identifying <br /> allocation of costs associated with Clearwater Meadows. <br /> Hellings interjected; the issues could perhaps be ironed out in a meeting between staff and <br /> Mr. Goertz, then bring the results back to the council. Hellings explained the council's <br /> options are to either adopt the assessments noting the objection was timely received. <br /> Which gives the developer 30 days to appeal to the district court or, if the council so <br /> chooses, to direct staff to sit down with the developer and the developer's attorney to see <br /> if the questions can be appropriately answered. If not, perhaps allow the litigation to <br /> continue, as Mr. Hellings was comfortable with either option. <br /> March asked Carolyn Drude if the assessment role had to be adopted for the cash flow <br /> situation for the City, since the City has been cash flowing this project based on the sale of <br /> the bonds and the timing of the cut off for certification. Drude responded her recollection <br /> of the meeting was 5 years and callable in 3 years. Further, the bonds are good through <br /> tonight only. <br /> Hellings suggested if the Engineer is comfortable to sit down with Mr. Goertz and his <br /> Attorney, they do so. An executive meeting with the council and attorney was held to <br /> discuss an employee issue. <br /> Nyberg asked if anyone had further questions, prior to the break. Fogerty agreed with Mr. <br /> Goertz and thought the construction costs were too high. Fogerty explained his <br /> assessment was based on benefit whereas, the Developer's assessments are based on cost <br /> of construction. Mark Edberg of 7072 Brian Drive asked if his well goes bad could he <br /> replace it. Nyberg said no, once it goes bad he would have to hook up. <br /> MOTION by Helmbrecht, seconded by Brenner, to close the meeting as the council <br /> discuss an upcoming personnel issue. Helmbrecht suggested in the meantime the <br /> Engineer and Mr. Goertz discuss the Clearwater Meadows and Brian Drive assessments. <br /> Motion carried unanimously. <br /> Meeting was closed at 7:30 PM, <br /> 7:30 PM Tom Wilharber arrived. <br /> Helmbrecht reconvened the November I3, 1996, Council Meeting at 8:00 PM. <br /> APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES <br /> MOTION by Hehnbrecht, seconded by Brenner to approve the October 23, 1996, council <br /> meeting minutes with corrections. Motion carried unanimously. <br /> PAYMENT OF CLAIMS <br /> 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.