Laserfiche WebLink
City of Centerville Meeting Minutes September 25, 1996 <br /> suggested the Capital Improvement Program be updated from 1994 and sent in to Met <br /> Council when complete. Such things as, City Wells, City Storage, Major Park expenses, <br /> lift stations, source of funding, time frames and how parks are dedicated will be required. <br /> Brenner asked when Senior Housing updates would be due for this comprehensive plan. <br /> Johnson suggested after Met Councils first review and prior to the city's public hearing. <br /> Johnson also suggested a resolution indicating when the city will comrnit to having each <br /> issue complete. Wilharber questioned page 17 & 19 if the comprehensive plan addressed <br /> the new FEMA maps. Johnson said no, if there is a new map it should be included. <br /> Wilharber asked if the new developments be included on the new map. Johnson explained <br /> the connections to the MUSA expansion is based on the physical numbers the city actually <br /> has connected. March asked what a typical time frame the city would be looking at to <br /> have MUSA extension. Johnson said a typical time frame would be about 60 days. <br /> Johnson said if a change is required he suggested putting it on the developer to make it <br /> logical and paying the associated fees. Brenner asked about the high density areas that <br /> have been excluded from future development. Johnson commented the city needs to place <br /> high - density areas to comply with the Met Council requirements, and stated it should be <br /> best if done before the preliminary plan goes to Met Council. March questioned the <br /> density of the Housing Action Plan. Johnson stated Met Council requirements must be <br /> met and Centerville should be okay. Dan Tourville of 6994 Centerville Rd, questioned the <br /> inappropriate spacing of the green area on the growth map. Johnson stated all errors <br /> should be addressed now. Further, suggested lake property located by Waterworks be <br /> dedicated as a high density area. Helmbrecht questioned the value impact on the change <br /> of land use. Johnson said if its not a legally conforming use it may be subject to a lawsuit. <br /> Limiting the land to a park designation would be a nice buffer between the high/low <br /> density areas. Tourville questioned the zoning in the downtown area. Johnson comment <br /> the zoning should be addressed in the zoning ordinance which is stated on page 45, <br /> Further, the zoning ordinance should address townhome developments, nixed uses, such <br /> as the downtown area, to accommodate the city's needs. Brenner asked who should <br /> address each of the built items on page 57 -58. Johnson suggested each item should be <br /> addressed by the Planning and Zoning except. Completion of a local surface water <br /> management plan which should be the Engineer, Ordinance provisions which require <br /> connection to public sewer and water when available and evaluate the feasibility of <br /> establishing housing and economic development initiatives which should be addressed by <br /> City Council. <br /> MOTION by Brenner, seconded by Powers- Rasmussen to have Dean Johnson submit the <br /> Comprehensive Plan to the Metropolitan Council with improvements. Motion carried <br /> unanimously. <br /> Council recessed at 8.25 P.M. <br /> Laura Powers - Rasmussen left <br /> UNFINISHED BUSINESS <br /> 3 <br />