Laserfiche WebLink
City of Centerville <br />Council Meeting Minutes <br />September 25, 2013 <br />Item was discussed previously. <br /> <br />Motion by Council Member Fehrenbacher, seconded by Council Member King to <br />approve the submitted Special Event Permit Application as presented subject to <br />additional provisions placed by the Centennial Fire District, Centennial Police <br />Department and the Public Works Department and waiving associated fees. All in <br />favor. Motion passed. <br /> <br />2. Special Event Permit Application & Temporary Event On-Sale Liquor License – <br />Centerville Lions Use of LaMotte Park Ice Rink ~ Oktoberfest Fundraiser <br />(October 19, 2013) <br /> <br />Item was discussed previously. <br /> <br />Motion by Council Member Love, seconded by Council Member King to approve <br />the submitted Special Event Permit Application and Temporary Event On-Sale <br />Liquor License as presented subject to additional provisions placed by the <br />Centennial Fire District, Centennial Police Department and the Public Works <br />Department and waiving associated fees. All in favor. Motion passed. <br /> <br /> <br />3. Centerville Road Reconstruction <br /> <br />Several residences who either reside or own property along Centerville Road appeared <br />before Council expressing their concerns regarding the proposed reconstruction; tree loss, <br />street widening, proposed turn lanes, and storm drainage. Many of the residents felt that <br />there was no need for turn lanes and desired that Council represent their constituents’ <br />opinions to Anoka County on their behalf. Residents expressed their understanding of <br />the roadways need for reconstruction, repairing storm drainage, adding municipal utilities <br />and pedestrian sidewalk/bike path. Among those residences that spoke were Mr. and <br />Mrs. Dave Popp, 1697 Hunter’s Trail, Mr. Robert Peters, 6831 Centerville Road, and Mr. <br />Ron Hogan, 6892 Centerville Road. <br /> <br />Discussion ensued regarding costs, potential assessments, the importance of storm sewer <br />drainage, ponding, the County’s possible repercussions with removing the proposed turn <br />lanes (complete mill and overlay only or apply the funding elsewhere within the County), <br />and resident’s need to communicate with their County Commissioner also. Consensus of <br />the Council was that the City Engineer should inquire of Anoka County as to whether the <br />turn lanes would be a requirement of the reconstruction. <br /> <br />4. Ord. #XX, Second Series – Fee Schedule 2014 <br /> <br />Motion by Council Member Fehrenbacher, seconded by Council Member King to <br />table the proposed ordinance All in favor. Motion passed. <br /> <br />5. Res. #13-020 – Approving Changes to Utility Billing Procedures <br /> <br />Page 3 of 5 <br /> <br />