My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2016-01-05 P & Z Packet
Centerville
>
Planning & Zoning
>
Agenda Packets
>
1994-2022
>
2016
>
2016-01-05 P & Z Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/15/2015 2:47:54 PM
Creation date
12/15/2015 2:47:02 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
52
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Each community has a process it must go through in order to get to an adoptable water supply plan.We <br /> are available to assist cities and want to continue to work with each community on water supply <br /> planning over the next year as needed,so that your plan includes effective water conservation measures <br /> and can be approved by DNR. <br /> Paul also reported that of the cities that estimated their potential water conservation/reduction goals, <br /> they ranged from Oho to 17% <br /> Metropolitan Council Summer Water Savings <br /> Brian Davis,from Met Council, provided individualized reports on potential water savings that could be <br /> achieved by reducing the ratio of summer to winter water use. He had calculations for all the cities <br /> except Columbus and Lexington. His calculations are based on water use reports from 1994-1998 <br /> compared to 2008-2012. <br /> The summer to winter water use ration has gone up significantly. Just by going back to earlier summer <br /> water use the combined cities could save 250 million gallons/years. We would 27%of the way to our <br /> 17%water reduction goal with just this one action. Reducing summer water use is cheaper too. <br /> Small group discussion summary <br /> At a meeting of 12 of the 13 communities(Vadnais Heights not present) participants compiled the <br /> following draft list of actions. These commitments will be finalized as each community completes their <br /> required Water Supply Plan by Dec.31,2016. <br /> Goal <br /> Cooperatively reduce our combined water use from 5.5 billion gal/yr.to 4.5 billion gal/yr. in the next ten <br /> years,or less <br /> Collaborative Efforts: <br /> 1. Develop a uniform brand for conservation messaging(DNR and MC) <br /> 2. Consistent water regulations and cooperative enforcement(the ordinance are currently a wide <br /> gamut),this is a political issue, some people don't even know where they live <br /> 3. Education consortium to provide same message—maybe with SWCDs or watersheds—could be <br /> in local movie theaters <br /> 4. Encourage grants for water reuse and aquifer recharge through DNR or Met Council <br /> 5. Need more grants/cooperative funding for water projects <br /> 6. How to deal with loss of revenue or shift of revenue <br /> 7. Support at city council meeting from DNR/MC to help educate the council members and answer <br /> questions <br /> 8. Outreach through U of M Extension Nonpoint Education for Municipal Officers(NEMO) <br /> Individual City Efforts <br /> Centerville: <br /> • Education—likely the biggest source of water conservation <br /> • Stormwater reuse <br /> • Review hydrant flushing practices <br /> Discussion: They will need to educate the wealthy residents that conservation is important. The current <br /> ordinances are great, but enforcement is difficult. The city needs to figure out how to constructively <br /> enforce water ordinances. <br /> 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.