Laserfiche WebLink
Philosophical ideas of why the area must Conserve Water and <br /> Why the 17% is reasonable - compiled from previous meetings <br /> 1. All MN water suppliers, serving over 1,000 people are being asked to conserve water as <br /> part of the Water Supply Planning process and as a result of the new demand reduction <br /> law. <br /> 2. According to the agreement there needs to be a 17%total reduction from the eight year <br /> average (down to a 4,539 MGY total for the 13 cities) <br /> 3. Each city needs to reduce their annual volume at least 10%. <br /> 4. Water conservation is on the right track in the area. Even just maintaining 2014 water <br /> use gets us part way to our goal. <br /> a. Looking at the Table 1, in 2014 there were four cities that already achieved more <br /> than a 17% reduction from their 8 year average water appropriation (Lino Lakes, <br /> Shoreview, Vadnais Heights, White Bear Township) <br /> b. Five more cities have achieved 10% reductions in 2014 (Circle Pines, Hugo, <br /> Mahtomedi, North St. Paul, and White Bear Lake). <br /> c. In 2014 three cities saw decline in water appropriations from their 8 year <br /> average (Centerville, Columbus and Forest Lake) <br /> d. Lexington water use varies considerably from year to year. In 2012, 2019, and <br /> 2008 they would have achieved a 10% reduction. <br /> 5. Since 1995 the groundwater elevation of the Prairie du Chien aquifer has decreased at <br /> an average rate of 3.5" per year (DNR Well data) <br /> 6. Overconsumption of groundwater is contributing to a significant decrease in the level of <br /> some Twin Cities lakes, including White Bear Lake. <br /> Success Stories—Existing Water Efficiency Programs in WBL Area <br /> • White Bear Lake (WBL) &Township have distributed faucet aerators using local money <br /> and are also doing a variety of conservation education programs. <br /> • Reconciliation of water use by auditing water to identify losses and leak detection. <br /> • Cooperative energy reduction—these program help to reduce costs;they are not tied to <br /> water directly. <br /> • Shoreview has included neighbor water use comparisons in water bill and also send out <br /> Leak Detection Postcards when they see water running 24 hours/day; however, there <br /> have been some user concerns expressed (privacy) <br /> • Remote meter reads—consumer awareness <br /> • New meters—provide more detailed time/day. Consumers can request the breakdowns <br /> of use to identify their peak use times. <br /> • Shoreview—they are identifying pilot areas and 400 volunteers to participate in before <br /> and after monitoring with technology performance that tracks water use trends and real <br /> time use. They can have remote access to bills and usage. This pilot is to determine if <br /> consumer use changes as a result of this program. <br /> • Race 2 Reduce—Grant program that is providing curriculum for schools (1-120 for Life), <br /> residential education and rebates and creating table top displays for events. <br /> 6 <br />