My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2019-09-25 CC Minutes - Approved
Centerville
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2010-2023
>
2019
>
2019-09-25 CC Minutes - Approved
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/11/2019 1:02:04 PM
Creation date
10/11/2019 1:02:03 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City of Centerville <br />Council Meeting Minutes <br />September 25, 2019 <br /> <br />that the base fee for sewer Collection rate is charged at the established rate multiplied by the <br />number of SAC units determined by Met. Council. He stated that on the water side for billing no <br />such multiplication is made. He also stated that the fee schedule for sewer clearly states that the <br />collection rate is to be charged at $39.69/SAC Unit and the Water System Management Rate does <br />not indicate either a per REU or SAC Unit. He stated that a commercial business with multiple <br />SAC units pays the same base rate (Water System Management Fee) as a much smaller business <br />with only one SAC unit. He stated that he felt that a large business with high demand for water <br />and fire protection should pay the base rate multiplied by the number of SAC Units/REUs and was <br />proposing that Council consider this change during its annual Fee Schedule Ordinance Adoption. <br /> <br />Motion by Council Member Montain, seconded by Council Member Love to Adopt Changes <br />to the Fee Schedule Associated with a Water System Management Fee for Commercial <br />Accounts Base Rate and Fire Connection Fee as Presented with an Additional Reading as <br />Needed. All in favor. Motion carried. <br /> <br />Lengthy discussion was had regarding larger accounts such as Centennial School District and the <br />Church of St. Genevieve and how multiplying numerous REU/WAC units by the base fee would <br />affect them, that a fee calculation be based off of 2+ for those that exceed two units, doubling <br />someone’s bill seemed inappropriate, and surveying other cities regarding this item. <br /> <br />3. Res. #19-0XX – Adopt Preliminary Budget <br /> <br />Mayor Paar stated that staff and Council have been working diligently for the past five (5) months <br />on a 2020 Preliminary Budget along with the Public Safety entities (CLPD/CFD). He stated that <br />all have attempted to keep budgets low while providing adequate services. <br /> <br />Administrator Statz stated that the Parks & Recreation Committee along with the Economic <br />Development Authority also submitted budgets that were contained in the City’s portion. <br /> <br />Finance Director DeJong stated that in adopting the resolution setting the preliminary 2020 budget <br />is inclusive of four (4) different items setting a preliminary general fund budget with revenues and <br />expenditures totaling $2,729,183 and laying out the levies sent to Anoka County for inclusion <br />Truth and Taxation. He stated that it was a two (2) step process as at the beginning of the year all <br />of the assessing work was completed which derived an assessed value to all homes and now (Truth <br />in Taxation) the City’s Preliminary Budget/Tax Levy will be applied to that assessed value. He <br />stated that residents would be receiving their Truth in Taxation Notices at the end of November <br />which will show them their taxes for the upcoming year and tell them about the City’s Truth in <br />Taxation Hearing based on City of Centerville, Anoka County, the Centennial School District and <br />other districts. <br /> <br />He stated that the levies for this year would be $2,310,695 for the General Fund, $457,263 for <br />Debt Service for Bonds so the total levy is $2,767,958 which is a 2.24% increase from the previous <br />year’s levy. This does not mean that everyone will experience this increase because it is based on <br />property value. <br /> <br />He also stated that several funds that were not levied ($263,756) for due to funds being available <br />from the debt service fund to pay them off when due and saving taxpayers. <br />Page 6 of 9 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.