My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2019-08-14 CC Minutes - Approved
Centerville
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2010-2023
>
2019
>
2019-08-14 CC Minutes - Approved
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/11/2019 3:36:47 PM
Creation date
10/11/2019 3:36:46 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City of Centerville <br />Council Meeting Minutes <br />August 14, 2019 <br /> <br />and lots within those platted development were of similar size. He stated that the downtown area <br />is much different with numerous lots being made up of several 50’ lots and the inclusion of the <br />school and church parcels. He stated that with this project assessments range from $2,800 - $9,000 <br />with the school and church being much larger as they own significantly larger amounts of property <br />and larger parcels. <br /> <br />Administrator Statz stated that the assessment do not include storm sewer or watermain <br />installation. He stated that upon connection, fees would be paid as parcels are connected. <br /> <br />Mayor Paar thanked Ms. Schlegel for her review of the Feasibility Report. <br /> <br />Discussion ensued regarding the needed work, inclusion in the 2003 Pavement Management Plan, <br />grant funding, income qualifications for water connection, special assessments for those that do <br />not meeting the income qualification guidelines, financial burden on homeowners, costs of the <br />project and timing, construction costs of the roadway being 7 ton versus 9 ton, the reasoning behind <br />the 9 ton recommendation, parking spaces and right of way sizes larger than other areas of town. <br /> <br />b. Review of Financing Plan <br /> <br />Finance Director DeJong reviewed the financing options that the City would have and stated that <br />funds are relatively healthy if the project was constructed in 2020 with the final wear course placed <br />in 2021. He stated that the Street Fund would have the potential for going negative during the <br />construction of approximately $81,000. He stated that some individuals will pay for their <br />improvement up front with others being assessed over a period of 10-15 years. He estimated that <br />assessment in 2020 and 2021 would be approximately $30,000. He stated that he hoped that <br />quantities of materials, contingency fees and administrative costs would be below the estimates. <br /> <br />Finance Director DeJong stated that the water fund would incur its regular expenditures during the <br />project but felt that it would benefit from those homeowners that qualified for the financial <br />assistance of the CDBG funds. He stated that it was anticipated that the City would receive lateral <br />benefit fees of $8,000 and other costs in the amount of approximately $10,000 per property from <br />16 homes ($160,000). He stated that with these assumptions that fund would not go below <br />$2,444,000 during construction. <br /> <br />Finance Director DeJong stated that the Storm Water Fund balance would not be affected by this <br />project as it generates approximately $75,000 per year. It was felt that no storm pond or major <br />repairs to the system would be needed during the construction period. <br /> <br />Finance Director DeJong discussed the City’s ability to bond for the anticipated shortfall in the <br />Street Fund. He stated that staff was not recommending this action due to the requirement of 20% <br />of the project costs needing to be assessed which could increase assessments and that if the City <br />paid cash it would save funds by not paying bond issuance costs and interest. He stated that the <br />Street fund would quickly recover and that not too many cities can afford to pay for such projects <br />with cast. <br /> <br />Discussion ensued regarding the use of General Funds for the shortfall, bonding in the past, <br />thanking previous Council’s for their for thought of establishing the Street Fund for funding in the <br />Page 4 of 8 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.