My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2022-08-10 CC Packet
Centerville
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1996-2022
>
2022
>
2022-08-10 CC Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/6/2022 7:28:02 AM
Creation date
8/6/2022 7:26:23 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
75
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City of Centerville <br />Council Meeting Minutes <br />June 8, 2022 <br />$80,000 is for mitigation only. Mr. Glaser stated that the sound study has been paid for. A lengthy <br />discussion ensue as to the noise and noise study and how it was going to be curtained. <br /> <br />Mr. Glaser Î page 13 Î He stated that this was a simple but important change called indemnity. It <br />states that Amazon will take care of the City if they cause trouble or the development causes <br />trouble. He stated that neither of the lawyers like the way this language read. He stated that there <br />are two types of ways that the court can make someone better Î force somebody else to pay money <br />and they can do another thing called equity (restraining order or order them to do something). <br />What the City is asking Amazon to do is to indemnify the City and hold us harmless to anything <br />they might do from and against and such claims at law or equity. If money makes us whole or a <br />restraining order make us whole it benefits both parties and takes care of our needs. <br /> <br />Mr. Glaser stated that there was other major change that both parties asked to have a different <br />Maintenance Agreement that they wrote into the DeveloperÓs Agreement that is mutually <br />beneficial thing for example: Amazon wanted to build a private sewer in the CityÓs right of way. <br />They havenÓt finished designing or built the project yet. What the agreed too is that both parties <br />agreed to what they call the Maintenance Agreement. For example: the City has a lift station in a <br />corner of the Amazon property, we are agreeing as long as they let us stay there, we will maintain <br />it because it is the CityÓs. If they want to put in a private sewer in the CityÓs right of way and it <br />works out on the engineering side, we let them do it. TheyÓll agree they will maintain it. <br />Administrator Statz stated that this parts out what belong to who and who will maintain it. They <br />have 12 fire hydrant and private infrastructure which would be there responsibility. Mayor Love <br />asked Administrator Statz if our infrastructure robust enough to handle this. Administrator Statz <br />stated yes. He stated that on all of the water systems there is a shut off valve. He stated that the <br />sewer is a little more difficult because there is not a shut of valve. You could put an inflatable ball <br />to stop the sewer but this would most like not happen unless the building was abandon or if there <br />was a chemical spill. <br /> <br />Administrator Statz stated that the only bits of infrastructure they would need to get at would be <br />the storm water system. We are responsible for that. ThatÓs why we have easements and they are <br />responsible to maintain the storm water like property owners. <br /> <br />Motion by Council Member Lakso, seconded by Council Member King to Approve the Res. <br />#22-0XX and including the two additional printed amendments part a and part b to the <br />Resolution #22-0XX which was provided at council table as stated by the City Attorney. <br />Mayor Love, Council Members Koski, Lakso and King Yay, Council Member Mosher Nay. <br />Motion carries 4-1. <br />b. Maintenance Agreement between Rice Creek Watershed District and City <br />4. Resolution #22-0XX Î Ordering the Feasibility Report for the 2022 Thin Overlay <br />and City Hall Parking Lot Improvements <br /> <br />Administrator Statz stated that this was a formality that we authorized the engineer proposal last <br />council meeting for the Feasibility Study. He neglected to put in there the formal resolution <br />authorizing for the preparation of ordering the Feasibility Reporting. This is an important step in <br />the 429 process. The Engineer will come back at next council meeting with that Feasibility Report. <br />Page 5 of 10 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.