Laserfiche WebLink
RELEVANT LINKS: <br /> <br /> Before closing the meeting, the council must state on the record the <br /> <br />specific grounds permitting the meeting to be closed and describe the <br /> <br /> <br />subject to be discussed. <br /> <br /> <br /> The meeting must be electronically recorded, and the recording must <br /> <br />be preserved for at least three years after the meeting. <br /> <br />DPO 14-007, DPO 15-002, <br /> At the next open meeting, the public body must summarize its <br />and DPO 16-002 (discussing <br />conclusions regarding the evaluation. The council should be careful <br />what type of summary is <br />sufficient). <br />not to release private or confidential data in its summary. <br />c. Attorney-client privilege <br />Minn. Stat. § 13D.05, subd. <br />Meetings between the governing body and its attorney to discuss active, <br />3(b). <br />threatened, or pending litigation may be closed when the balancing of the <br />Brainerd Daily Dispatch, <br />purposes served by the attorney-client privilege against those served by <br />LLC v. Dehen, 693 N.W.2d <br />435 (Minn. Ct. App. 2005). <br />the open meeting law dictates the need for absolute confidentiality. The <br />Prior Lake American v. <br />need for absolute confidentiality should relate to litigation strategy, and <br />Mader, 642 N.W.2d 729 <br />(Minn. 2002). DPO 16-003. <br />will usually arise only after a substantive decision on the underlying <br />DPO 17-003. <br />matter has been made. <br />Northwest Publications, Inc. <br />This privilege may not be abused to suppress public observations of the <br />v. City of St. Paul, 435 <br />decision-making process, and does not include situations where the <br />N.W.2d 64 (Minn. Ct. App. <br />1989). Minneapolis Star & <br />council will be receiving general legal opinions and advice on the <br />Tribune v. Housing and <br />strengths and weaknesses of a proposed action that may give rise to future <br />Redevelopment Authority in <br />and for the City of <br />litigation. <br />Minneapolis, 251 N.W.2d 620 <br />(Minn. 1976). <br />Minn. Stat. § 13D.01, subd. 3. <br />The following procedure must be used to close a meeting under this <br />exception: <br />See Free Press v. County of <br /> Before closing the meeting, the council must state on the record the <br />Blue Earth, 677 N.W.2d 471 <br />specific grounds permitting the meeting to be closed and describe the <br />(Minn. Ct. App. 2004) <br />(holding that a general <br />subject to be discussed. <br />statement that a meeting was <br />being closed under the <br />The council should also describe how a balancing of the purposes of <br />attorney-client privilege to <br />the attorney-client privilege against the purposes of the open meeting <br />discuss “pending litigation” <br />did not satisfy the <br />law demonstrates the need for absolute confidentiality. <br />requirement of describing the <br /> The council must actually communicate with its attorney at the <br />subject to be discussed). <br />meeting. <br /> <br />d. Purchase or sale of property <br /> <br />A public body may close a meeting to: <br />Minn. Stat. § 13D.05, subd. <br /> Determine the asking price for real or personal property to be sold by <br />3(c). <br />the public body. <br /> <br />League of Minnesota Cities Handbook for Minnesota Cities 7/11/2023 <br />Meetings, Motions, Resolutions, and Ordinances Chapter 7 | Page 16 <br /> <br />