Laserfiche WebLink
33 <br />. <br />s <br />a <br />t i <br />. I <br />stage <br />-Under <br />trail from the <br />Avenue) given <br /> <br />Avenue) could <br /> <br />th <br />on the west side <br /> <br />th <br />multiuse <br />near the threshold for <br /> <br />54 (20 <br />triping a crosswalk and other <br />S <br />and the overall need timeline <br /> <br /> <br />center island to allow for a 2 <br />at Red Oak Lane have expressed <br /> / <br />here is no park facility <br />expected to be <br />A potential interim improvement could be <br /> <br />Avenue) <br />th <br />mph. <br />- <br />better utilize the existing <br /> Currently, t <br />and act as a gateway treatment for the community <br /> <br />connection to this facility could be provided as part of a <br />operations are <br /> <br />Avenue) and CSAH 34 (Birch Street) intersection. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />th <br />(20 <br /> <br />context <br />in this area. <br /> <br />use trail <br />and residents feel unsafe crossing CSAH 54 (2054 <br />However, development east of CSAH <br /> <br />and the length of the crossing. <br /> <br />peak hour <br />multi <br /> <br />Avenue) <br />new <br /> <br />th <br />A <br />vehicle speeds <br />Avenue). <br /> <br />th <br />Red Oak Lane to CSAH 34 (Birch Street)Residents along the west side of CSAH 54 (20pedestrian crossing concernof CSAH 54 (20current treatments, such as a rectangular rapid flashing beacon <br /> (RRFB) are not typically recommended on roadways with a speed limit in excess of 40to widen the roadway to accommodate a raised mediancrossing. However, further discussion with Anoka <br /> County and the area residents would likely be needed before moving forward.An alternative consideration would be to neighborhood to CSAH 34 (Birch Street), which is approximately 350 <br /> feet west of CSAH 54 (20future project at the CSAH year 2040 conditions,warranting improvement. increase the need to provide the east leg of the intersectionalso important to consider <br /> how a roundabout (versus a traditional intersection) would help change the overall corridor Therefore, both alternatives are offered for future planning purposes and should be monitored <br /> as development and area transportation changes occur. <br /> <br />