My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2006-12-13 Packet
Centerville
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1996-2022
>
2006
>
2006-12-13 Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2011 11:01:39 AM
Creation date
12/8/2006 3:10:43 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
155
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />City of Centerville <br />Council Meeting Minutes <br />November 29, 2006 <br /> <br />Mayor Capra agreed that the Ordinance mirrored training and therapy in 2002 and she <br />would be open to forwarding this to the Planning and Zoning Commission for their <br />reVIew. <br /> <br />City Administrator Larson added that it would be useful to modify facility requirements. <br /> <br />City Attorney Glaser specified the need for vigilance for those people who would abuse <br />nonspecific licensing, as there are different types of massage therapy. He then suggested <br />making sure that insurance certification is up-to-date and criminal background checks are <br />completed. <br /> <br />Mayor Capra also inquired about inspections. The applicant responded that inspection <br />was not State regulated but said that the Legislature was working on it. City Attorney <br />Glaser added that the City would perform inspections and, in this case, the chiropractic <br />office housing the massage therapy business would be inspected. City Administrator <br />Larson stated that the ordinance would exempt inspection if the applicant was working <br />for the chiropractor. However, the applicant said that she planned to operate a separate <br />business under a joint venture with the chiropractor. <br /> <br />Council Member Lee stated that he would not want an ordinance restricting a good <br />business from coming into the community but acknowledged that there is opportunity for <br />ordinance violations. <br /> <br />Council Member Terway added that there would need to be a way to cover all bases for <br />the people who might not be legitimate, also noting his support for the current applicant's <br />request. <br /> <br />The applicant commended the City for requiring a criminal history before licensing. <br /> <br />City Administrator Larson stated that the issue of home occupation had not yet been <br />raised but would be expected. Council Member Lakso responded that St. Paul, as an <br />example, required a separate living area from the office. <br /> <br />Council Member Lee said he favored a business front because doing business out of <br />residential houses provides opportunity for crossing the line. Mayor Capra suggested <br />defining "therapist," rather than using "massage parlor." <br /> <br />City Administrator Larson said home businesses would be more difficult to inspect <br />randomly. He then said he appreciated feedback from Council and would draft <br />something for review by the Planning and Zoning Commission at their next meeting with <br />separate specifications for massage therapy (requiring 500 hours of training and <br />professional liability) and massage parlor (undergoing more regulation). City Attorney <br />Glaser reiterated the need to regulate, to ensure there would be no prostitution. He also <br />acknowledged the need to legitimize professional massage therapy. <br /> <br />Page 13 of 16 <br /> <br />/3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.